Retirement Income Planning

How the Build Back Better Bill Could Affect You

Print Friendly and PDF

While the House just passed along the $1.2 Trillion infrastructure bill to President Biden, the final version of the Build Back Better bill is still in question. The Center has been actively monitoring this bill and how it could affect our clients’ financial lives for the last several months. Throughout that time, the contents of the bill have significantly evolved. Initially, the proposed bill seemed to include many changes that would meaningfully impact tax and income planning for many clients. Then, it seemed as though all of the individual tax consequences were off the table. Now, some of those tax features are back with, perhaps, a middle ground. Some of the highlights are outlined below, but keep in mind that this version is still up for debate and revision until this bill becomes a law!

Changes to Retirement Account Rules

- Back-door Roth IRA contributions would no longer be available. This strategy used to fund a Roth IRA, even if your income phases an individual out of the ability to make a direct Roth IRA contribution. This would no longer be available with the Build Back Better bill, but it could only affect those considered “high-income,” or defined as income above $400,000. If this is included in the final bill, great clarity can be expected on who this will impact.

- Eliminating the ability to convert after-tax 401(k) and employer retirement plan contributions to a Roth IRA.

- New contribution limits for IRA and defined contribution retirement accounts based on the account balance.  

    • Right now, the ability to make an IRA, Roth IRA, or employer retirement plan contribution is not associated with the size of the account. Under the Build Back Better bill, account holders with retirement account balances exceeding $10 million (as of the end of the prior year) would not be able to contribute. If contributions are made, or a contribution causes the account to breach that $10 million level, a 6% excise tax would be imposed. In order to assist in tracking this kind of requirement, employers would be required to report participants with account balances above $2.5 million.

- Increase in required minimum distributions for “high-income” taxpayers whose accounts surpass that $10 million limit.

    • It seems as if 50% of the account balance above the $10 million thresholds would need to be withdrawn. So, if you have an $11 million IRA, you would be forced to take a $500,000 withdrawal as a required minimum distribution. Failure to complete the required minimum distribution would result in a 50% excise tax on any amount not taken.

State and Local Income Tax Deduction Cap

- The current State and Local Income tax deduction is limited to $10,000 per year. The Build Back Better bill would increase this limit to $80,000 per year.

Surcharge on High-Income Individuals, Trusts, and Estate

- For individuals, a 5% surcharge would be imposed on those with modified adjusted gross income in excess of $10 million, with an additional 3% surcharge on income above $25 million.

- For trusts and estates, the 5% surcharge would be imposed on modified adjusted gross income above $200,000, with an additional 3% surcharge on income above the $500,000 level.

The Build Back Better bill would also continue the expanded Child Tax Credit into 2022 and provide additional tax credits for those who purchase electric vehicles. Although these items are still up for debate and could change drastically before being implemented, we are staying on top of these revisions as they occur.

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CDFA®, is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation.

Reviewing your Social Security Benefit Statement

Print Friendly and PDF

According to the Social Security Administration, on average, Social Security will replace about 40% of one’s pre‐retirement earnings. Given the diligent savings and consistently wise financial decisions many of our clients at The Center have made over the years, this percentage might not be quite as high. However, in our experience, Social Security is still a vital component of one’s retirement plan. Let’s review some of the important aspects of benefit statements to ensure you’re feeling confident about your future retirement income.

History of Mailed Statements

In 1999, the Social Security Administration (SSA) began mailing paper copies of Social Security statements to most American workers. Since that time, through several budget reduction initiatives, this process has dramatically changed. As we stand here today, no worker under the age of 60 receives a projected benefit statement by mail. Only those who receive statements by mail are both 60 and older and have not yet registered for an online SSA account.

Online Access – The “my Social Security” Platform

I have to hand it to Social Security – they’ve done a fantastic job, in my opinion, by creating a very user-friendly and easy‐to‐follow online platform to view benefit statements and projections. To create a user account or to sign in to your existing account, click here. If you have not set your account up and wish to do so, you’ll be prompted to provide some basic personal identifiable information such as your name, Social Security number, date of birth, address, e‐mail address, etc. The SSA has also made several great cyber security improvements, including dual‐factor authentication and a photo of a state‐issued photo ID, such as a driver’s license, to verify identification. This is similar to a mobile check deposit that many banks now offer on a smartphone.

Interpreting your Projected Future Income

Benefit projections at various ages can be found on page 2 of your Social Security statement. As you’ve likely heard your advisor share in the past, each year you delay benefits, you’ll see close to an 8% permanent increase on your income stream. Considering our low‐interest‐rate environment and historically high cost of retirement income, this guaranteed increase is highly attractive. It’s important to note that estimated benefits are shown on your statement in today’s dollars and do not take inflation into account. That said, the latest 2020 annual reports from SSA and Medicare Boards of Trustees use 2.4% as an expected future annual inflation amount. Click here to learn more about the sizeable cost of living adjustment in 2022 for those currently receiving Social Security. You should also be aware that Social Security assumes your current earnings continue until “retirement age,” which is not necessarily the same as “full retirement age.” This can potentially be a significant issue for those retiring earlier (i.e., before age 60 in most cases). Click here to learn more about how your income benefits are determined.

Earnings History and Fixing Errors

Page 3 of your Social Security statement details the earnings that the SSA has on file for each year since an individual began working. Believe it or not, SSA does make mistakes! Our team makes it a best practice to review a client’s earnings history on the statement to see if there are any significant outlier years. In most cases, there’s a good reason for an outlier year with income, but it’s simply an error in others. If you do notice an error with your earnings that needs to be fixed to ensure it does not negatively impact your future Social Security benefit, you have a few options. Once supporting documentation is gathered (i.e., old tax returns, W2s, etc.), you can contact the SSA by phone (800‐722‐1213), visit a local SSA office, or complete Form SSA-7008.

Believe it or not, in some circumstances depending on filing strategies, one can generate as much as $1M in total lifetime benefits from Social Security! If you have yet to file, however, there’s a good chance it’s been a bit since you’ve reviewed your benefit statement. If our team can help interpret your benefit statements, please feel free to reach out. The stakes are too high with Social Security, and we are here to help you in any way we can!

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax advice. You should discuss any tax matters with the appropriate professional. The information has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Every Investor’s situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon before making any investment, Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.

Social Security Cost of Living Adjustment & Wage Base for 2021

Print Friendly and PDF

It has recently been announced that Social Security benefits for millions of Americans will increase by 5.9% beginning January 2022. This is the largest cost of living adjustment in 40 years! The increase is calculated based on data from the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, or CPI-W, from October 1st, 2020 through September 30th, 2021. Inflation has been a point of concern and received a great deal of media attention this year, so this increase comes as welcome news for Social Security recipients who have received minimal or no benefit increase in recent years.

The Social Security taxable wage base will also increase in 2022 from $142,800 to $147,000. This means that employees will pay 6.2% of Social Security tax on the first $147,000 earned, which translates to $9,114 of Social Security tax. Employers match the employee amount with an equal contribution. The Medicare tax remains at 1.45% on all income, with an additional .9% surtax for individuals earning over $200,000 and married couples filing jointly who earn over $250,000.

For many, Social Security is one of the only forms of guaranteed fixed income that will rise over the course of retirement. However, the Senior Citizens League estimates that Social Security benefits have lost approximately 33% of their buying power since the year 2000. This is why, when working to run retirement spending and safety projections, we factor an erosion of Social Security’s purchasing power into our clients’ financial plans.

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CDFA®, is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.

How to Reduce the Risks of Dementia and Diminished Capacity to Your Retirement Plan

Sandy Adams Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

Senility is what they used to call it and it only happened to the very elderly like our great grandparents.  Surely, not us. We are healthy, educated, and financially well off, so we don’t need to talk about senility or plan for it. THINK AGAIN!

Senility is now known as Alzheimer’s, a disease that accounts for 60-80% of dementia. The statistics are alarming! According to the Alzheimer’s Association, more than 1 in 9 people over age 65 have Alzheimer’s disease. The chances of an Alzheimer’s diagnosis doubles every five years after age 65 (beginning at approximately 5.3% at age 65 and going from there).   If the disease runs in your family, a head injury, hypertension, diabetes, stress, excess weight, depression, and many other conditions increase your risk of diagnosis.

Risks of Not Planning

I don’t need to tell you that losing your memory is a scary proposition. The fact that you could live for years (if you are otherwise healthy) without knowing who you are, where you are, who any of your loved ones are, and not recall your short nor most of your long-term past is frightening.  Even more disturbing is that you also forget how to care for yourself, and your body begins to forget how to function.  Family may be able to assist you at first, but as time goes on professional care is usually needed.  A few thousand per month for at-home caregivers is not out of the question.  As more care is required, the few thousand dollars per month can quickly become five thousand to ten or twelve thousand dollars a month, depending on the level of care needed and where you live. The impact on your financials, if you haven’t planned, can be detrimental.

In addition to the care risks, there are capacity risks.  Those who develop Alzheimer’s or related dementia go through a period (sometimes before their diagnosis or possibly early in their diagnosis) when their capacity is considered “diminished.”  They are not yet considered fully incapable of making their own decisions. In other words, the right to make decisions has not yet been taken from them, but their ability to make decisions is compromised.  In this stage of the game, we are generally watching for behavioral changes in clients:

  • Missing Appointments

  • Getting confused about instructions/having difficulty following instructions

  • Making more frequent calls to the office to ask the same questions

  • Trouble handling paperwork

  • Difficulty recalling decisions or actions

  • Changes to mood or personality

  • Poor judgment

  • Memory Loss (generally)

  • Difficulty with basic financial concepts

Concerns that are more significant can be financial fraud and exploitation. Clients with diminished capacity are incredibly vulnerable to others who try to take advantage of their inability to understand what is or is not real. Unfortunately, 1 in 10 seniors over age 65 are victims of financial exploitation, according to the Government Accountability Office, with losses totaling over $3 billion annually. While most of this exploitation is at the hands of strangers, sometimes family, friends, and caregivers exploit the vulnerable.

Proactive Solutions

Now that I have completely frightened you about dementia and diminished capacity, let’s take a step back and look at what we can and should be doing to plan and protect your plan proactively against these risks.

From a personal health perspective, the Alzheimer’s Association suggests:

  • Combined physical and mental exercise

  • Continuous Learning

  • Social Engagement

  • Get good sleep

  • Eat a healthy diet (Mediterranean Diet recommended)

From a financial planning perspective, it makes sense to put together a proactive aging strategy as part of your retirement planning to address the potential risks of dementia/Alzheimer’s/diminished capacity on your comprehensive financial plan.  What should this aging strategy address?

  •  Legal Documents

  • Care

  • Finances

  • Legacy

Dementia and diminished capacity are scary.  We don’t want to think about a time when we might not remember our names, remember our loved ones, or even recognize our reflections in the mirror. Dementia and diminished capacity can wreak havoc on our families and our financial security if we don’t plan. Take steps today to put together an aging strategy so that you and your loved ones are prepared. Preparation is the best defense!  If you or anyone you know need assistance with this topic, please let us know.  We are always happy to help!

Sandra Adams, CFP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and holds a CeFT™ designation. She specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and serves as a trusted source for national publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine, and Journal of Financial Planning.

Biden’s “American Families Tax Plan” Proposal and How It Could Affect You

0921 JB_American Families Tax Plan.jpg

Josh Bitel Contributed by: Josh Bitel, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

Ever since President Joe Biden has taken office, there has been much talk about how the tax landscape may change. On September 13th, Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee released their new tax proposals. While the outcome may differ from the proposals listed below, we always want to keep you informed on proposed changes. Highlights are summarized below.

 New Top Ordinary Income Tax and Capital Gains Rate

Perhaps the most talked about piece of the proposal is the return of the 39.6% income tax bracket. This rate was previously in place from 2013-2017 but reduced to 37% with the Tax Cuts And Jobs Act of 2017. However, this new proposal does not simply replace the 37% bracket with the 39.6%. Instead, it reduces the amount of income a taxpayer can have before being placed in that top bracket. Single taxpayers making over $400,000 or married couples making over $450,000 will be in the new top bracket under this proposal.

 Along with ordinary income tax brackets, top capital gains tax brackets may also change. The major difference between this change and the ordinary income tax change is that (if approved) this will go into effect immediately and impact all capital gains from that point forward. In contrast, the ordinary income tax brackets won’t change until 2022. See the chart below for proposed capital gains tax changes.

Proposed Capital Gains Tax Changes

Proposed Capital Gains Tax Changes

Changes to Roth IRA Strategies

 This one may hurt more for advisors. If enacted, this part of the proposal prohibits converting after-tax dollars held in retirement accounts to Roth IRAs. In other words, the “backdoor Roth IRA” and the “Mega backdoor Roth IRA” would be left in the dust.

 Another proposed change would go a bit further. In 2032, Roth CONVERSIONS for high-income earners would be prohibited. Any single person earning over $400,000, or married couples earning over $450,000, would be impacted by this rule.

These are just a few of the many changes proposed by Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee. Of course, the actual bill may look drastically different than the proposals listed in this blog. Planners here at The Center will be sure to stay on top of any changes and keep you informed as they come out.

Josh Bitel, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® He conducts financial planning analysis for clients and has a special interest in retirement income analysis.

Finding Meaningful Ways to Spend When Your Financial Plan Allows

0901 SA_Finding Meaningful Ways to Spend When Your Financial Plan Allows.jpg

Sandy Adams Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

Several months ago, I wrote about clients who had developed such great savings habits to retire that they were shocked they could spend more in retirement than they had been spending in pre-retirement (“Can You Change Your Spending Habits in Retirement”). Of course, by the time this happens, most clients realize that it is very difficult, if not impossible, to change their spending habits or their lifestyle in general. Ultimately, they have trouble spending the money they have available to them.

I continue to have discussions in financial planning reviews with these clients when their retirement spending continues to be well below what is possible for their long-term financial success. Often this generates meaningful conversations regarding what might be possible with the excess funds, for the clients to make their lives more enjoyable and valuable, and for their families and communities.

Here are just some of the ideas that have come out of these discussions:

  • Annual gifting to children — in cash or specifically for the individual needs for the children and/or their families.

  • Assisting with grandchildren’s education.

  • Taking a memorable trip(s) that the client has always dreamed of taking.

  • Creating or contributing to a scholarship program at the client’s former school/university.

  • Making a significant donation to a charity that has special meaning to the client.

  • Investing in a hobby that has significant meaning/value to the client.

  • Helping a family member that is struggling financially.

While spending more than what is necessary is still not easy for most of these clients, they begin to find that it makes more sense and is easier to do when the spending is meaningful for them, their families, or their community. And with the help of a financial advisor along the way to make sure that the spending is still in line with their plan, even if they do those things that are meaningful (and sometimes fun), they can move forward with confidence and find new ways to be creative with their spending.

Sandra Adams, CFP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and holds a CeFT™ designation. She specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and serves as a trusted source for national publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine, and Journal of Financial Planning.

Death of the Stretch IRA

Print Friendly and PDF
 
 

In December 2019, the SECURE Act was signed into law, it has had a material impact on current and future tax planning since its implementation in 2020. This new legislation carries several critical updates for investors, but the most meaningful change affects an individual’s plan to transfer or receive generational wealth. The elimination of the “Stretch IRA” for most non-spouse beneficiaries will change the most effective planning strategies wealth managers use to help beneficiaries who will be inheriting retirement accounts now and in the future.

The three major changes from the secure act are:

  • The Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) age went from 70 ½ to 72.

  • Those 70 and older can now make Traditional IRA contributions (must have earned income)

  • A large scale Inherited IRA Overhaul, aimed at complicating tax withdrawal strategies from Inherited IRA accounts aka “the death of the Stretch IRA”

The most impactful change from this list is the Inherited IRA Overhaul, the contributing factor that will affect many financial and estate plans is:

  • RMD’s for many inherited IRA’s are no longer required, but in most cases, the account must be liquidated within 10 years of the year of death of the primary account holder.

This change will affect all pre-tax retirement accounts, while after-tax accounts such as the Roth IRA distributions will house different tactical distribution strategies.

During the presentation we talk through some creative planning strategies that can be implemented to potentially save current and future taxes under these new legislative measures, such as: using Roth IRA conversions to reduce taxable IRA assets and increase tax-free dollars, Tax-Efficient Charitable Giving through Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs), and beneficiary distribution planning to nullify tax burden.

Finally, we use a pair of case studies to demonstrate how these strategies can reduce tax liability and maximize the achievement of client goals.

To better understand why a retiring couple who are beginning to plan their legacy, or an individual inheriting retirement accounts will need quality tax planning advice - now more than ever, will have their questions answered during this talk.

Applicable timestamps for specific segments are listed below for convenience:  

1:17 – Center for Financial Planning Team Introduction

2:52 – About the Host (Nick Defenthaler)

3:40 – The Secure Act Overview

7:20 – Death of “The Stretch” IRA

11:32 – Today’s Inherited IRA Rules

15:49 – Tax Environment as a Result of TCJA

18:26 – Getting Creative - Roth IRA Conversions

24:40 – Getting Creative – Tax Efficient Charitable Giving

29:12 – Getting Creative – Beneficiary Designations

31:12 – Case Study – Retiree Couple & Legacy Planning

39:38 – Case Study – Beneficiary of an Inherited IRA

49:19 – Creating a Tax Plan

Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected, including diversification and asset allocation. IRA tax deductibility and contribution eligibility may be restricted if your income exceeds certain limits, please consult with a financial professional for more information. Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Tips for Managing Restricted Stock Units

Robert Ingram Contributed by: Robert Ingram, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

Does your employer offer company stock as part of your compensation package? There are many forms of equity compensation ranging from different types of stock awards to employee stock options (ESO) and employee stock purchase plans (ESPP). Over the last several years, Restricted Stocks Units (RSU) have become one of the most popular alternatives offered by companies. 

 Unlike pure stock awards that grant shares of stock or stock options that provide an employee the right to purchase shares at a predetermined price for a specific period of time, grants of RSUs are not actual shares of stock (yet). An RSU is essentially a promise made by the employer company to deliver to the employee shares of stock or cash payment for the value of stock shares following a vesting schedule. The vesting schedule is often based on a required length of employment, such as a three-year or four-year period, or other company performance goals. The number of units generally corresponds to shares of stock, but the units have no value until the employee receives the corresponding stock shares (or equivalent payment) when they vest.  

 How do RSUs Work? 

Let’s say your employer company grants you 1,000 Restricted Stock Units this year with a grant date of September 1st, and a 4-year vesting schedule under which 25% of the units vest each year as shares of the company’s stock. The following September 1st after the original grant date (one year later) as long as you had continued your employment, the first 25% of your 1,000 RSUs vests as actual company stock shares. Assuming the market value of the stock at the time of vesting is $50 per share, you would have 250 shares of stock worth $12,500. 

 Once the shares have vested and been delivered, you now have ownership rights such as voting rights and rights to dividend payments. You can also choose to hold or to sell the shares from that point. In each subsequent year going forward, the next 25% of your RSUs would vest until the 4th year when the remaining 250 of the 1,000 units vest. 

 One of the first important planning considerations for Restricted Stock Units is their taxation. How are RSUs taxed and how might that impact your tax situation?

 There are three triggering events with RSUs to understand.

 When You Receive RSU Grants

In most cases, at the time you receive your RSU grants, there are no tax implications. Because there is no transfer of actual property by the company until vesting in the form of shares or cash payment, the IRS does not consider the value of the stock represented by RSUs as income compensation when the grant occurs. This means the RSU grants themselves are not taxed.

 When RSUs Vest 

 Once the restricted units vest and the employer delivers the shares of stock or equivalent cash payment, the fair market value of the vested shares or cash payment as of that date (minus any amount the employee had to pay for the RSUs) is considered income and is taxed as ordinary income. Typically, companies grant RSUs without the employee paying a portion, so the full value of the vested shares would be reported as income.  

 In our example above with the 1,000 RSU grants, 250 RSUs vested with the fair market value of $50 per share for a total value of $12,500. This $12,500 would be considered compensation and would be reportable as ordinary income for that tax year. This would apply to the remaining RSUs in the years that they vest. Because this amount is treated as ordinary income, the applicable tax rate under the federal income tax brackets would apply (as well as applicable state income taxes).  

 To cover the tax withholding for this reported income at vesting, most companies allow you a few options. These may include:

  • Having the number of shares withheld to cover the equivalent dollar amount

  • Selling shares to provide the proceeds for the withholding amount

  • Providing a cash payment into the plan to cover the withholding

When You Sell Shares 

 At the time RSUs vest, the market value of those shares is reported as ordinary income. That per-share value then becomes the new cost basis for that group of shares. If you immediately sell the vested shares as of the vesting date, there would be no additional tax. The value of the shares has already been taxed as ordinary income, and the sale price of the shares would equal the cost basis of the shares (no additional gain or loss).

 If however, you choose to hold the shares and sell them in the future, any difference between the sale price and the cost basis would be a capital gain or capital loss depending on whether the sale price was greater than or less than the cost basis.  

 Once again using our example of the 1,000 RSU grants, let’s assume the fair market value of 250 shares at vesting was $50 per share and that you held those shares for over one year. If you then sold the 250 shares for $75 per share, you would have a capital gain of $25 per share ($75 - $50) for a total of $6,250. Since you held the shares for more than one year from the vesting date, this $6,250 would be taxed as a long-term capital gain and subject to the long-term capital gains tax rate of either 0%, 15%, or 20% (as of 2021) depending on your total taxable income. 

 If you were to sell shares within one year of their vesting date, any capital gain would be a short-term capital gain taxed as ordinary income. Since the federal tax brackets apply to ordinary income, you may pay a higher tax rate on the short-term capital gain than you would on a long-term gain even at the highest long-term capital gains rate of 20% (depending on where your income falls within the tax brackets).

 Planning for Additional Income

Because Restricted Stock Units can add to your taxable income (as the units vest and potentially when you sell shares), there are some strategies you may consider to help offset the extra taxable income in those years. For individuals and couples in higher tax brackets, this can be an especially important planning item.  

Some examples could include:

  • Maximizing your pre-tax contributions to your 401k, 403(b), or other retirement accounts. If you or your spouse are not yet contributing to the full annual maximum, this can be a great opportunity. ($19,500 in 2021 plus an extra $6,500 “catch up” for age 50 and above). In some cases, if cash flow is tight, it could even make sense to sell a portion of vested RSUs to replace the income going to the extra contributions.

  • Contributions to a Health Savings Account (HSA) are pre-tax/tax-deductible, so each dollar contributed reduces your taxable income. If you have a qualifying high deductible health plan, consider funding an HSA up to the annual maximum ($3,600 for individuals/$,7,200 for family coverage, plus an extra $1,000 “catch up for age 55 and above)

 Deferred Compensation plans (if available) could be an option. Many executive compensation packages offer types of deferred compensation plans. By participating, you generally defer a portion of your income into a plan with the promise that the plan will pay the balance to you in the future. The amount you defer each year does not count towards your income that year. These funds can grow through different investment options, and you select how and when the balance in the plan pays out to you, based on the individual plan rules. While this can be an effective way to reduce current income and build another savings asset, there are many factors to consider before participating. 

  • Plans can be complex, often less flexible than other savings vehicles, and dependent on the financial strength and commitment of the employer.

  • Harvesting capital losses in a regular, taxable investment account can also be a good tax management strategy. By selling investment holdings that have a loss, those capital losses offset realized capital gains. In addition, if there are any remaining excess losses after offsetting gains, you can then offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income per year. Any excess losses above the $3,000 can be carried over to the following tax year.

 When Should I Sell RSUs?

 The factors in the decision to sell or to hold RSUs that have vested as shares (in addition to tax considerations) should be similar to factors you would consider for other individual stocks or investment securities. A question to ask yourself is whether you would choose to invest your own money in the company stock or some other investment. You should consider the fundamentals of the business. Is it a growing business with good prospects within its industry? Is it in a strong financial position; or is it burdened by excessive debt? Consider the valuation of the company. Is the stock price high or low compared to the company’s earnings and cash flow?

Consider what percentage of your investments and net worth the company stock represents. Having too high a concentration of your wealth in a single security poses the risk of significant loss if the stock price falls. Not only are you taking on overall market risk, but you also have the risk of the single company. While each situation is unique, we generally recommend that your percentage of company stock not exceed 10% of your investment assets.

You should also consider your financial needs both short-term and long-term. 

Do you have cash expenses you need to fund in the next year or two and do you already have resources set aside? 

If you’re counting on proceeds from your RSUs, it could make sense to sell shares and protect the cash needed rather than risk selling shares when the value may be lower.  

 As you can see, equity compensation and specifically RSUs can affect different parts of your financial plan and can involve so many variables. That’s why it’s critical that you work with your financial and tax advisors when making these more complex planning decisions. 

So please don’t hesitate to reach out if we can be a resource.

Robert Ingram, CFP®, is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® With more than 15 years of industry experience, he is a trusted source for local media outlets and frequent contributor to The Center’s “Money Centered” blog.

Disclosure: While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

How To Manage Your Finances After A Divorce

Print Friendly and PDF
0609 KH How to Manage Your Finances After a Divorce.jpg

Divorce isn’t easy.  Determining a settlement, attending court hearings, and dealing with competing attorneys can weigh heavily on all parties involved. In addition to the emotional impact, divorce is logistically complicated.  Paperwork needs to be filed, processed, submitted, and resubmitted.  Assets need to be split, income needs to be protected, and more paperwork needs to be submitted!  With all of these pieces in motion, it can be difficult to truly understand how your financial position will be impacted.  Now, more than ever, you need to be sure that your finances are on the right track.  Although every circumstance is unique, there are few steps that are helpful in most (if not all) situations.

Assess your current financial situation

Following a divorce, you’ll need to get a handle on your budget. You may be responsible for paying expenses that you were once able to share with your former spouse.  What are your current monthly expenses and income?  Regarding expenses, you’ll want to focus on dividing them into two categories: fixed and discretionary.  Fixed expenses include things like housing, food, transportation, taxes, debt payments, and insurance.  Discretionary expenses include things like entertainment and vacations.

Reevaluate your financial goals

Now that your divorce is finalized, you have the opportunity to reflect on your needs and wants separate from anyone else.  If kids are involved, of course their needs will be considered, but now is a time to reprioritize and focus on your needs, too.  Make a list of things you would like to achieve, and allow yourself to think both short and long-term.  Is saving enough to build a cash cushion important to you?  Is retirement savings a focus?  Are you interested in going back to school?  Is investing your settlement funds in a way that reflects your values important to you?

Review your insurance needs

Typically, insurance coverage for one or both spouses is negotiated as part of a divorce settlement, however, there is often still a need to make future adjustments to coverage.  When it comes to health insurance, having adequate coverage is a priority.  You’ll also want to make sure that your disability or life insurance matches your current needs.  Property insurance should also be updated to reflect any property ownership changes resulting from divorce.

Review your beneficiary designations & estate plan

After a divorce, you’ll want to change the beneficiary designations on any life insurance policies, retirement accounts, and bank or credit union accounts. This is also a good time to update or establish your estate plan.

Consider tax implications

Post-divorce your tax filing status will change.  Filing status is determined as of the last day of the year.  So even if your divorce is finalized on December 31st, for tax purposes, you would be considered divorced for that entire year. Be sure to update your payroll withholding as soon as possible.

You may also have new sources of income, deductions, and tax credits could be affected. 

Stay on top of your settlement action items

Splitting assets is no small task, and it is often time consuming.  The sooner you have accounts in your name only, the sooner you will feel a sense of organization and control.  Diligently following up on QDROs, transfers, and rollovers is important to make sure nothing is missed and the process is moving forward as quickly and efficiently as possible.  Working with a financial professional during this process can help to ensure that accounts are moved, invested, and utilized to best fit your needs.

When your current financial picture is clear, it becomes easier to envision your financial future.  Similarly, having a team of financial professionals on your side can create a feeling of security and support, even as you embrace your new found independence.

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CDFA®, is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.


This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Opinions expressed in the attached article are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. All opinions are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. Neither Raymond James Financial Services nor any Raymond James Financial Advisor renders advice on tax issues, these matters should be discussed with the appropriate professional.

How The Historically High Cost Of Retirement Income Affects Your Financial Plan

Print Friendly and PDF
gfbdfvdf.jpg

Now more than ever, we find ourselves reminiscing. And if you’re like me, it’s usually about the simple things in life that were so easy to take for granted. Like going out to eat with a large group of friends, having a surprise birthday party for a loved one, or attending a sporting event or concert with a packed arena filled with 30,000 fans having a great time. COVID has caused this reminiscing to occur and it has also played a role in reminiscing of a world where investors used to receive a reasonable yield on portfolios for a relatively low level of risk.

Interest rates have been on a steady decline for several decades now, so COVID certainly isn’t the only culprit to blame here. That said, reductions in interest rates by the Federal Reserve when the pandemic occurred in spring 2020, certainly did not help. As an advisor who typically works with clients who are within 5 years of retirement or currently retired, it’s common to hear comments like, “When we’re drawing funds from our accounts, we can just live off of the interest which should be at least 4% - 5%!”. Given historical dividend and bond yield averages and the fact that if we go back to the late 90s, an investor could purchase a 10 year US treasury bond yielding roughly 7% (essentially risk-free being that the debt was backed by the US government), I can absolutely see why those who lived through this time frame and likely saw their parents living off this level of interest would make these sort of comments. The sad reality is this – the good old days of living off portfolio interest and yield are pretty much dead right now (unless of course, you have a very low portfolio withdrawal rate) and it will likely remain this way for an extended period.

One way to look at this is that the average, historical “cost” to generate $1,000 of annual income from a 50% stock, 50% bond balanced portfolio has been approximately $25,000 (translates into an average yield of 4%). Today, an investor utilizing the same balanced portfolio must invest $80,000 to achieve the $1,000 annual income goal. This is a 320% increase in the “cost” of creating portfolio income!  

It’s worth noting that this is not an issue unique to the United States. The rising cost of portfolio income is a global conundrum as many countries are currently navigating negative interest rate environments (ex. Switzerland, Denmark and Japan). Click here to learn more about what this actually means and how negative interest rates affect investors. Below is a chart showing the history of the 10-year US government bond and US large cap equities from 1870 to 2020.

Source: Robert Shiller http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/

Source: Robert Shiller http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/

The chart is a powerful visual and highlights how yields on financial assets have taken a nosedive, especially since the 1980s. The average bond yield over 150 years has been 4.5% and the average dividend yield has been 4.1%. As of December 2020, bond yields were at 0.9% and dividend yields stood at 1.6% - quite the difference from the historical average!

So why this dramatic reduction in yields? It’s a phenomenon likely caused by several factors that we could spend several hours talking about. Some experts suggest that companies have increasingly used stock repurchases to return money to shareholders which coupled with high equity valuations have decreased dividend yields globally. Bond yields have plummeted, in part from a flight to safety following the onset of the pandemic as well as the Federal Reserve’s asset purchasing program and reduction of rates that has been a decade-long trend.

The good news is that a low-interest rate environment has been favorable for stocks as many investors (especially large institutional endowments and hedge funds) are realizing that bonds yields and returns will not satisfy the return requirements for their clients which has led to more capital flowing into the equity markets, therefore, creating a tailwind for equities.

Investors must be cautious when “stretching for yield”, especially retirees in distribution mode. Lower quality, high yield bonds offer the yields they do for a reason – they carry significantly more risk than government and high quality corporate and mortgage-backed bonds. In fact, many “junk bonds” that offer much higher yields, typically have a very similar correlation to stocks which means that these bonds will not offer anywhere near the downside protection that high quality bonds will during bear markets and times of volatility. In 2020, it was not uncommon to see many well-respected high yield bond mutual funds down close to 25% amid the brief bear market we experienced. That said, many of these positions ended the year in positive territory but the ride along the way was a very bumpy one, especially for a bond holding!

The reality is simple – investors who wish to generate historical average yields in their portfolio must take on significantly more risk to do so. It’s also important to note that higher yields do not necessarily translate into higher returns. US large cap value stocks are a perfect example of this. Value stocks, which historically have outperformed growth stocks dating back to the 1920s, have underperformed growth stocks in a meaningful way over the last 5 years. This underperformance is actually part of a longer trend that has extended nearly 20 years. Value companies (think Warren Buffet style of investing) will pay dividends, but if stock price appreciation is muted, the total return for the stock will suffer. Some would argue that the underperformance has been partially caused by investors seeking yield thus causing many dividend-paying value companies to become overbought. In many cases, the risk to reward of “stretching for yield” just isn’t there right now for investors, especially for those in the distribution phase. It simply would not be prudent to meaningfully increase the risk of a client’s allocation for a slight increase in income generated from the portfolio.

As we’ve had to do so much over the past year with COVID, it’s important for investors, especially retirees, to shift their expectations and mindset when it comes to portfolio income. Viewing one’s principal as untouchable and believing yield and income will be sufficient in most cases to support spending in retirement is a mistake, in my opinion. Maximizing total return (price appreciation and income) with an appropriate level of risk will be even more critical in our new normal of low rates that, unfortunately, has no sign of leaving anytime soon.

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.


Views expressed are not necessarily those of Raymond James and are subject to change without notice. Information provided is general in nature, and is not a complete statement of all information necessary for making an investment decision, and is not a recommendation or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. There is an inverse relationship between interest rate movements and bond prices. Generally, when interest rates rise, bond prices fall and when interest rates fall, bond prices generally rise. Past performance is not indicative of future results. There is no assurance these trends will continue or that forecasts mentioned will occur. Investing always involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss. No investment strategy can guarantee success.