Unpacking Incentive Stock Options

Contributed by: Matt Trujillo, CFP®

What is an ISO?!

Some of you reading this might have been granted Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) in the past or perhaps this is something that your employer recently started to grant you. In either case it never hurts to get a refresher on what they are and some of the nuanced planning opportunities that go with them. ISOs are a form of stock option that employers can grant to employees often to reward employees' performance, encourage longevity with the company, and give employees a stake in the company's success. A stock option is a right to buy a specified number of the company's shares at a specified price for a certain period of time. ISOs are also known as qualified or statutory stock options because they must conform to specific requirements under the tax laws to qualify for preferential tax treatment.

The tax law requirements for ISOs include*:

• The strike price—the price you will pay to purchase the shares—must be at least equal to the stock's fair market value on the date the option is issued.

• To receive options, you must be an employee of the issuing company.

• The exercise date cannot be more than 10 years after the grant.

*Special rules may also apply if you own more than 10 percent of your employer's stock (by vote). Nonqualified stock options, another type of employee stock option, are separate from ISOs therefore receive different tax treatment.

Once you have been granted a stock option, you can buy the stock at the strike price even if the value of the stock has increased. If you choose to exercise a stock option, you must buy the stock within the specific time frame that was set when the option was purchased or granted to you. You are not required to exercise a stock option.

Your options may be subject to a vesting schedule developed by the company. Unvested options cannot be exercised until some date in the future, which often is tied to your continued employment. The stock that you receive upon exercise of an option may also be subject to a vesting schedule.

Assuming that a stock option satisfies the tax law requirements for an ISO, preferential tax treatment will be available for the sale of the stock acquired upon the exercise of the ISO, but only if the stock is held for a minimum holding period. The holding period determines if a sale of the stock you received through the exercise of an ISO is subject to taxation as ordinary income or as capital gain or loss.

To receive long-term capital gain treatment, you must hold the shares you acquired upon exercise of the option for at least:

• Two years from the date you were granted the option, and

• At least one year after the date that you exercised the option

So whether this is something new to you or something you’ve been handling for a long time, feel free to contact us with questions regarding the nuances around Incentive Stock Options.

Matthew Trujillo, CFP®, is a Certified Financial Planner™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Matt currently assists Center planners and clients, and is a contributor to Money Centered.

---

This information does not purport to be a complete description of Incentive Stock Options, this information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Investing in stocks always involves risk, including the possibility of losing one's entire investment. Specific tax matters should be discussed with a tax professional.

Qualified Charitable Distributions: Giving Money while saving it

Contributed by: Nick Defenthaler, CFP®

Late last year, the Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) from IRAs for those over the age of 70 ½ was permanently extended through the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015. Previously, the QCD was constantly being renewed at the 11th hour in late December, making it extremely difficult for clients and financial planners to properly plan throughout the year. If you’re over the age of 70 ½ and give to charity each year, the QCD could potentially make sense for you. 

QCD Refresher

The Qualified Charitable Distribution only applies if you’re at least 70 ½ years old. It essentially allows you to donate your entire Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) directly to a charity and avoid taxation on the dollars coming from your IRA. Normally, any distribution from an IRA is considered ordinary income from a tax perspective, however, by utilizing the QCD the distribution from the IRA is not considered taxable if the dollars go directly to a charity or 501(c)(3) organization.    

Let’s look at an example:

Sandy, let’s say, recently turned 70 ½ in July 2016 – this is the first year she has to take a Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) from her IRA which happens to be $25,000. Sandy is very charitably inclined and on average, gifts nearly $30,000/year to her church. Being that she does not really need the proceeds from her RMD, but has to take it out of her IRA this year, she can have the $25,000 directly transferred to her church either by check or electronic deposit. She would then avoid paying tax on the distribution. Since Sandy is in the 28% tax bracket, this will save her approximately $7,000 in federal taxes!

Rules to Consider

As with any strategy such as the QCD, there are rules and nuances that are important to keep in mind to ensure proper execution:

• Only distributions from a Traditional IRA are permitted for the QCD.

• Employer plans such as a 401k, 403b, Simple IRA or SEP-IRA do not allow for the QCD

• The QCD is permitted within a Roth IRA but this would not make sense from a tax perspective being that Roth IRA withdrawals are tax-free by age 70 ½ *

• Must be 70 ½ at the time the QCD is processed.

• The funds from the QCD must go directly to the charity – the funds cannot go to you as the client first and then out to the charity.

• The amount you can give to charity through the QCD is limited to the amount of your RMD.

• The most you can give to charity through the QCD in a given year is $100,000, even if one’s RMD exceeds that amount.

The QCD can be a powerful way to achieve one’s philanthropic goals while also being tax-efficient. The amount of money saved from being intentional with how you gift funds to charity can potentially keep more money in your pocket, which ultimately means there’s more to give to the organizations you are passionate about. Later this month, we will be hosting an educational webinar on philanthropic giving – click here to learn more and register, we hope to “see” you there!

Roth IRA owners must be 59½ or older and have held the IRA for five years before tax-free withdrawals are permitted.

Nick Defenthaler, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick is a member of The Center’s financial planning department and also works closely with Center clients. In addition, Nick is a frequent contributor to the firm’s blogs.

---

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. Please note, changes in tax laws may occur at any time and could have a substantial impact upon each person's situation. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Are your Medicare Premiums about to Increase?

Contributed by: Nick Defenthaler, CFP®

If you’re like most, chances are you have not heard of what’s known as the “hold harmless” provision set forth under the Social Security Act. To keep things simple, this provision is essentially in place to protect the majority of those on Medicare from seeing jumps in Part B premiums when Social Security benefits do not increase through cost-of-living adjustments (COLA). 

For the second year in a row, due to low inflation, the hold harmless provision is coming into play. This year, there was no COLA for those receiving Social Security and 2017 is projected to only see a minuscule 0.2% bump in benefits. If you’re single and have an adjusted gross income (AGI) below $85,000 or are married and have an AGI below $170,000, your Medicare Part B premiums will not increase – you are part of the group whom the hold harmless provision protects (approximately 70% of those on Medicare). For those with income higher than the thresholds mentioned above, however, (which is approximately 30% of those on Medicare), you will more than likely see yet another increase in your Medicare Part B premiums in 2017 that is currently projected to be approximately 22%.    

It’s also important to note that those who are “sheltered” under the hold harmless provision (AGI below $85,000 for single filers, AGI below $170,000 for married filers) are only those who are currently receiving Social Security benefits. For example, if you’re 66 years old, receiving Social Security benefits and enrolled in Medicare, you will not see a jump in your Part B premium. If you’re currently age 64 but plan on delaying Social Security benefits until age 70, however, there is a very high probability that when you begin Medicare at age 65, your Part B premiums will be higher than they are for current enrollees. 

As mentioned previously, the same situation occurred last year and the actual increases in Medicare Part B premiums ended up being much less than what was initially projected (here’s a link to when I covered the topic last year). In October, we will be hosting a webinar on Medicare and we’re hoping to have more clarity on any potential premium increases at that time. Keep your eyes open for more information surrounding this topic and our October webinar! As always, if you have questions before then, please contact us.

Nick Defenthaler, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Nick is a member of The Center’s financial planning department and also works closely with Center clients. In addition, Nick is a frequent contributor to the firm’s blogs.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler and not necessarily those of Raymond James. These hypothetical examples are for illustration purposes only. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.

Webinar in Review: Cash Balance Plans

Contributed by: Clare Lilek

Here at The Center for Financial Planning, Inc., we host webinars not only for our clients but also for other professionals who we may work with as part of the team to best serve our clients. During these webinars, our CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNERS™ dive into specific topics in greater detail than you might find in a typical blog. In our latest webinar of this kind, Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, with the help of Abram Claude, Head of Value Add Programs Learning Center at Columbia Threadneedle Investments, hosted a 45 minute webinar detailing Cash Balance plans as a way to help business owners potentially accelerate retirement savings and lower taxes.

First, Abram clarified a cash balance plan as one type of defined benefit plan. He detailed the differences between a traditional defined benefit plan versus what the majority of the webinar discussed, a Cash Balance plan. Below you can reference a chart that distinguishes the two:

Typically, Cash Balance plans have been seen as an option only for larger companies, but many smaller businesses have been utilizing this retirement saving strategy because they’re usually easier to manage, they’re not as dependent on interest rate changes, and they offer the same benefit cost for the employer independent of the employee’s age or time with the company, compared to Traditional defined benefit plans.

Here are some questions to ask to determine whether or not a business might be a good fit for a Cash Balance plan:

• Does the business have a consistent, profitable history?

• Will the business have significant and consistent cash flow moving forward?

• Does the business have a budget that can support plan contributions?

• Does the business already maximize its contributions to a defined contribution plan (401k, 403b, etc.)?

• Are there multiple owners or partners?

• Do the business owners or partners want to accelerate their ability to save for retirement and save taxes?

• Is there a low ratio of non-highly compensated employees to highly compensated employees?

• Are the highly compensated employees older than the non-highly compensated employees?

• Is the company relatively small in size (e.g. fewer than 20 eligible employees)

The more “yes,” responses, the greater possibility that a Cash Balance plan might be a good fit for your business or your clients!

For more information, watch the webinar below as Nick and Abram go into the details surrounding the mechanics of these plans, along with helpful examples to illustrate the potential benefits of a Cash Balance plan. If you have any questions after watching the webinar, please feel free to call the office or reach out Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, and we’d be happy to help!

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Clare Lilek and and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse the opinions or services of Abraham Claude.

Clare Lilek is a Challenge Detroit Fellow / Client Service Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.

---

Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse the opinions or services of Abram Claude and/or Columbia Threadneedle Investments.

Inherited IRA – Learn About Your Choices as a Non-Spouse Beneficiary

Contributed by: Laurie Renchik, CFP®, MBA

During a recent meeting with a client (let’s call her Anne), we discussed the options available to her as the beneficiary of her brother Jim’s IRA. This is an important discussion because there are certain tax benefits that come with inheriting an IRA, but the rules differ depending on whether you are a surviving spouse or what is called a non-spouse beneficiary. In this case Anne is considered a non-spouse beneficiary because she is the sister of the original account owner, Jim.

Here are the options available to Anne:

1. She can rollover the assets directly into an Inherited IRA for her benefit. With this option Anne will take distributions over her lifetime and enjoy the benefits of tax deferred growth.     

2. Anne can take a lump-sum distribution. With this option, there is an immediate tax impact. The value of the distribution is taxed as ordinary income in the year it is withdrawn. Because the IRA is inherited Anne can take the lump sum prior to age 59 ½ and not be subject to the 10% penalty that is usually applied for distributions before age 59 ½. 

3. The third option is that Anne does not have to take the inheritance. She can disclaim all or part of the inherited assets. If this option is chosen the assets pass to the next eligible beneficiaries.  If Anne considers this option she wants to be sure all of the legal requirements are met.

When handled correctly, Anne as a non-spouse beneficiary can enjoy the continued potential for tax-advantaged growth of these assets while avoiding the immediate income taxes.

Our discussion also highlighted some common mistakes to avoid:

1. A non-spouse beneficiary cannot move the inherited IRA into his or her own IRA. An inherited IRA must be kept totally separate from other IRA’s Anne may have and no new contributions can be deposited into the account.

2. Beneficiaries named on an IRA account supersede instructions provided in a will or trust. Since the IRA account information takes precedence it is important to make sure the designated beneficiaries named on the inherited IRA are up to date. 

3. No 60-day rollover. With this rule, you can take a distribution from your own IRA as long as you put the money back in the same account within 60 days, you won’t have to pay income taxes or a penalty. Unfortunately, you can’t do this with inherited IRAs. There is no 60 day rollover rule for inherited IRAs. If you withdraw the money, it’s taxed.

4. If you inherit an IRA, whether it’s traditional or Roth, the IRS requires you take at least some of the account balance each year. It’s called a required minimum distribution and must be taken annually, regardless of your age, beginning the year following the year-of-death of the original account owner. If you don’t take the distribution, the penalty ends up being 50% of the amount you were required to take.

If you are faced with decisions regarding an inherited IRA and have questions feel free to give me a call or send me an email.  I’ll be happy to review your options with you and make sure the choice works in harmony with the rest of your financial plan goals and objectives. 

Laurie Renchik, CFP®, MBA is a Partner and Senior Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® In addition to working with women who are in the midst of a transition (career change, receiving an inheritance, losing a life partner, divorce or remarriage), Laurie works with clients who are planning for retirement. Laurie is a member of the Leadership Oakland Alumni Association and is a frequent contributor to Money Centered.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Laurie Renchik and not necessarily those of Raymond James. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Every investor's situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon before making any investment. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation. Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Are Your Aging Parents a Roadblock in Your Retirement Planning?

Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP®

As the meat in the so-called “sandwich generation,” the baby boomers are approaching retirement at a record pace. As we work with clients and client couples to get their financial and non-financial “ducks in a row,” it is becoming more and more common to discuss issues surrounding the assistance of one or both sets of parents and aging/long term care issues. If this sounds familiar, here are the possible roadblocks that this can cause for your retirement planning and some suggestions about what you can do to prevent them.

What are the Roadblocks?

• Providing assistance/caregiving often limits the time you can work; you may be forced to take family leave time to provide care, go to part time work, or even take early retirement.

• Working less reduces earnings, providing less Social Security earnings, and less in retirement savings for future retirement.

• Stopping work prior to age 65 may mean a need to bridge a health insurance gap when that was not the original plan.

• Caregiving can be stressful, especially if you are trying to continue to work and also have responsibilities with adult children and/or grandchildren, so your own health can become a concern.

• With so much going on, just being able to keep your “eye on the ball” and concentrate on your own retirement goals can be a challenge.

What Can You Do to Make Sure To Stay On Track?

If you find yourself in the position of assisting aging parents, now or in the future, do not assume that all is lost. There are things that you can do to make sure that your own retirement will stay on track:

• Have conversations with your parents and plan ahead as much as possible to make sure that their long term care is funded; have a conversation to discuss if they are willing and able to have non-family members provide care if and when the time comes (at least until you retire); have a professional moderate the planning conversation if it’s not a talk your family is comfortable having on their own.

• If you do end up leaving work to care for an aging parent, discuss having a paid caregiver contract drafted or determine if your parent’s Long Term Care insurance policy has the ability to pay you for your services as a caregiver.

• Make sure others take their turn and spread the responsibilities amongst others (see my recent blog on Family Care Agreements); take breaks and take care of yourself (caregiver stress is a real thing!).

• Continue to meet with your financial planner on an annual basis to keep yourself focused on your own goals along the way—continue to save for retirement as you are able and make progress.

We all have roadblocks that slow our progress towards our goals; aging parents might be one of yours.  The love and care we have for our family—especially our parents—is not something we would ever deny, however frustrating it might be when it delays that ultimate freedom we call retirement. But if we plan ahead, and coordinate with our families and professional partners, we can hope to make the roadblock more of a speedbump.  Contact me if you have questions about how your financial planner can be of assistance.

Sandra Adams, CFP® is a Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Sandy specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and is a frequent speaker on related topics. In addition to her frequent contributions to Money Centered, she is regularly quoted in national media publications such as The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine and Journal of Financial Planning.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Sandy Adams and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.

Continuing to Work after Filing for Social Security

Contributed by: James Smiertka

If there’s a chance you will earn income while you are collecting Social Security, you will want to know about an extremely important rule put in place by the Social Security Administration called the “Earnings Test.” There are a variety of reasons why someone may earn income while receiving Social Security.  Whether it’s simply pursuing a passion after retirement or the financial need to pick up a part-time job, it’s important to fully understand the implications of earning income and collecting Social Security benefits prior to reaching your full retirement age (FRA). (Click here to see what your FRA is.) Once you reach full retirement age, however, you are not subject to any reduction of benefits from the “earnings test” on your earned income. Let’s take a look at two different examples in detail:

If you are under full retirement age (FRA) for the entire year:

• Earnings limit: $15,720

• Reduction of benefits: $1 for every $2 you earn above the earnings limit

• Example: John is currently 63 and his FRA is 66. John retires, immediately turns on Social Security benefits ($20,000/yr) but decides he wants to pursue his passion as a tutor and plans on earning $35,720 for the year. Since his earnings would be $20,000 over the Earnings Test limit ($35,720 – $15,720), one half ($1 of every $2 earned), or $10,000, would be withheld from his annual Social Security benefit, therefore, reducing John’s Social Security benefit to $10,000 for the year. 

In the year you reach full retirement age (FRA):

• Earnings limit: $41,880

• Reduction of benefits: $1 for every $3 you earn above the earnings limit

• Example: Sue is currently 65 but is reaching her FRA of 66 in a matter of months. She recently started collecting Social Security, which provides her $30,000/yr. Sue is still working, earning $161,880 annually and was not aware of the Social Security Earnings Test. Her earnings would be $120,000 over the earnings test limit ($161,880 – $41,880), one third ($1 of every $3 earned), or $40,000 would be withheld from her annual Social Security benefit. Since this amount is greater than her Social Security benefit, her entire benefit for this year would be withheld.

It’s important to note that if you have had Social Security benefits withheld because of your earnings, they are not lost forever. Once you reach full retirement age, your benefit will increase to compensate for the benefits that were withheld. It does, however, on average, take nearly 2 decades to essentially recover the benefits that were withheld. The bottom line is that there are very few instances where it would make sense to start collecting benefits if there is a strong likelihood that you will continue working. Instead of collecting Social Security early and more than likely having the majority (if not all) of your benefits withheld, you could simply delay benefits which permanently increases your Social Security benefit up to age 70 (More information on that here).

As you can see, there are many moving parts with Social Security, especially for clients who still plan to work prior to reaching full retirement age. Before turning your benefits on, we always recommend that you reach out to your financial planner to discuss your situation in detail to ensure the strategy you’re selecting is in line with your own personal goals and objectives. If you’d like to chat about your benefits and discuss different filing strategies, give us a call, we are happy to help! 

James Smiertka is a Client Service Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.

---

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Jim Smiertka and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Examples provided in this material are hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only.

How is Retirement Planning Relevant to me?

Contributed by: Matt Trujillo, CFP®

Lately I have been meeting with younger clients, and have been hearing a recurring theme: “Retirement is 20-30 years away and I don’t know that I care too much about how the numbers look at this time.” The first time I heard this, I was a little taken aback…I had always assumed that one of our core jobs was to make sure people were on a good track for retirement.

However, the more I thought about it, this line of thinking isn’t that out of the box. Consider how much the world around us has changed over the last 20-30 years. It is reasonable to think that another 20-30 years from today the world could change dramatically again?

Hearing these clients voice concerns about planning for an event so far into the future, I decided to take a different approach. I decided to focus clients’ attention, instead, on the next five to ten years and what they want their net worth statements to say then. For instance, if you have a negative net worth due to student loan debt, saving for retirement might seem out of the question; but if you come up with a goal to have a specific positive net worth amount ten years from today, it helps refocus your financial plan to something more tangible and meaningful for you and your family. This type of thinking can be very powerful and motivating for clients. The clients I have engaged in this exercise have told me that they get the sense they are working towards something tangible and each year they come in they can really see the benefits of working with a planner.

So if you are under the age of 45, and retirement seems like a lifetime away, consider putting a different spin on the old fashion retirement goal. Approach the problem a little differently. I think you will find that planning in five to ten year chunks can be more manageable and very motivating.

Matthew Trujillo, CFP®, is a Certified Financial Planner™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Matt currently assists Center planners and clients, and is a contributor to Money Centered.

---

Opinions expressed are those of Matthew Trujillo and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. All opinions are as of this date and are subject to change without notice.

Everyone’s Favorite Topics: Social Security and Taxes

Contributed by: Kali Hassinger

Throughout our entire working lives, our hard-earned cash is taken out of each paycheck and paid into a seemingly abstract Social Security Trust fund. As we see these funds disappear week after week, the pain of being taxed is hopefully somewhat alleviated by the possibility that, one day, we can finally collect benefits from the money that has been alluding us for so long. (Maybe you’re also comforted by the fact that you’re paying toward economic security for the elderly and disabled – or maybe not, but I’m an idealist). 

When the time to file for benefits finally arises, however, it may not be clear how this new source of income will affect your tax situation. Although no one pays tax on 100% of their Social Security benefits, the amount that is taxable is determined by the IRS based on your “provisional” or “combined” income. Provisional and combined income are terms that can be use interchangeably, so we will just use provisional from this point forward. Many of you may not be familiar with either term, but I’ll bet it’s no surprise that the beloved IRS uses a system that can be slightly confusing! No need to worry, though, because I’m going to provide you with the basics of Social Security taxation.

Determining your provisional (aka combined) income requires the following formula: 

Adjusted Gross income (AGI) includes almost all forms of income (salaries, pensions, IRA distributions, ordinary dividends, etc.), and it can be found on the 1st page of your Form 1040. AGI does not, however, include tax exempt interest – such as dividends paid from a municipal bond or excluded foreign interest. These can be powerful tax tools in individual situations, but they won’t help when it comes to Social Security taxation. The IRS requires that you add any tax-exempt interest received into your Adjusted Gross Income for this calculation. On top of that, you have to add ½ of your annual social security benefits. The sum of these 3 items will reveal your provisional income for Social Security taxation purposes.

After determining the provisional income amount, the IRS taxes your Social Security benefits using 3 thresholds: 0%, 50%, or 85%. This means that the maximum portion of your Social Security Benefits that can be considered taxable income is 85%, while some people may not be taxed at all. The provisional income dollar amount in relation to the taxation percentage is illustrated in the chart below: 

As you can see, it isn’t difficult to reach the 50% and 85% thresholds, which can ultimately affect your marginal tax bracket.  These thresholds were established in 1984 and 1993, and they have never been adjusted for inflation. The taxable portion of your benefit is the taxed at your normal marginal tax rate. 

Social Security, in general, can be a very confusing and intimidating topic, but it is also a valuable income resource for all who collect benefits. Everyone’s circumstance is different, and it’s important to understand how the benefits are affecting your tax situation. I encourage you to speak to your CPA or Financial Planner with any questions.

Kali Hassinger, CFP® is a Registered Client Service Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.

---

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Kali Hassinger and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

Retirement Behavior Zone

Contributed by: Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD

Let’s face it; market volatility isn’t a whole lot of fun for any investor—unless that volatility is on the upside, of course. When investments experience downward volatility it can be hard on the psyche. In my experience, however, there is one group that is hit especially emotionally hard: those clients that are on either side of two years from their retirement date. While those with long term horizons feel some pain, it is generally muted because the funds are needed in the distant future and it doesn’t seem to bother them as much. Similarly, those that have been in retirement for a while seem to have the “been there – done that” mentality. They have been through volatility before, hopefully have weathered past storms, and understand volatility is part of the process to potentially get fair returns over time.

But how about those within two years, either side, of retirement? Often times, these clients are the most concerned, and rightfully so. The time that folks switch from being a net saver for so many years to a net spender is emotionally challenging in many cases. As former partner Dan Boyce used to say, it feels like you are eating your seed corn. (Full disclosure – this city boy never really understood it but many a client nodded as if to confirm the saying!).

According to research underwritten by Prudential Securities, “economic researchers have found that emotions play a significant role in how people make financial decisions.” At first, my response was a yawn and a hope that Prudential didn’t pay too much for such a conclusion. Fortunately there was more to the study, something with a little more meat on the bone. The study suggests that the five years before and after retirement is critical. That understanding this behavioral risk becomes even more important. Two specific risks cited in the study include sequence risk and behavioral risk.

At the risk of downplaying behavior risk, it is one that we have some control of, after all. Poor investor behavior during this two year of period within retirement can be hazardous to your financial health, for a long time if not forever. What’s the prescription? Yes this is self-serving, but working with a third party professional can help improve investor behavior. Vanguard suggests that behavioral coaching may bring about as much as 150 basis points (or 1.5%) of value add by advisors.

The second risk, sequence risk, is very real and much less controllable. Large negative returns early in retirement can indeed impact one’s retirement years. Fortunately, for many, one large loss year usually isn’t enough to derail years of proper planning. Again, what’s the prescription? In general, utilizing multiple asset classes, multiple investment styles, and multiple managers (aka asset allocation & diversification) provides enough risk parameters to lessen the potential sequence risk. 

If recent volatility has hit you especially hard (emotionally or in dollars) give us a call. If you are a current client we welcome the opportunity to review your portfolio and your plan, and if you are not a current client we welcome the opportunity to provide another opinion.

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a contributor to national media and publications such as Forbes and The Wall Street Journal and has appeared on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), mentored many CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

---

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Timothy Wyman and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss regardless of strategy selected. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse the opinions or services of Vanguard or Prudential Securities. Diversification and asset allocation do not ensure a profit or protect against a loss. There is no guarantee that using an advisor will produce favorable investment results.