Do You Have Warren Buffett’s Stomach for Volatility?

It is rare that I don’t agree with advice from Warren Buffett, but earlier this year we took different sides of a debate. His recommendation for a simple, flawless investment strategy was putting 90% of your assets in an equity fund designed to mirror the performance of the S&P 500 and 10% in cash.

This sounds great if you have nerves of steel and can make it work. But most people can’t stomach it.  Buffett is an amazing investor who understands his emotions and has a great ability to see the value of companies and what he owns.  But we’re not all Warren Buffett.  That is one of the reasons there are financial advisors in the world who help people understand appropriate volatility in their portfolio and what to do when that volatility spikes. 

Your Own Risk Tolerance

One common question I got during the downturn five years ago was when do we stop the bleeding?  One client said to me, “I had $1,200,000. Now I have about $1,000,000 due to the financial crisis and the market falling.  When do I do something?” To determine a time to sell really takes two correct decisions.  When to sell and when to buy back in. It is almost impossible to be right twice consistently.   

These difficult questions were most prevalent during the final weeks of the financial crisis in January to March of 2009.  And there was a lot more bad news to come. GM’s pending bankruptcy was front stage in the spring of 2009.  If someone was to try and time the exit and reentry during this period, it could have been devastating. Actually, the S&P soared over 30% from March to June in 2009 in the face of such horrible news and if someone sold out, it would be almost impossible to buy back in without paying more.  And those are the people on the sidelines that missed one of the greatest markets in history.

Nerves of Steel or Appropriate Allocation?

No one knows when a market downturn will occur or for how long it will go. More importantly to reap the benefits of long-term equity returns we need to be in to win.  Even more important, we need to have the right amount allocated so that we can withstand any type of downdraft and wait it out.  

So, while Buffett and his steely nerves might be able to stay invested through thick and thin with 90% of his wealth in the stock market, most people need less volatility to stay the course.  Buffet realized the value of companies when they were extremely cheap in 2009, while most investors could only see the losses from the past. Through those challenging times when people kept asking if it was time to do something, many investors benefited from staying the course through the last market cycle and went on to reap the benefits of this bull market.  I believe some nerves were enforced with regular meetings, appropriate plan design and investment portfolio allocation.

Matthew E. Chope, CFP ® is a Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Matt has been quoted in various investment professional newspapers and magazines. He is active in the community and his profession and helps local corporations and nonprofits in the areas of strategic planning and money and business management decisions. In 2012 and 2013, Matt was named to the Five Star Wealth Managers list in Detroit Hour magazine.

Five Star Award is based on advisor being credentialed as an investment advisory representative (IAR), a FINRA registered representative, a CPA or a licensed attorney, including education and professional designations, actively employed in the industry for five years, favorable regulatory and complaint history review, fulfillment of firm review based on internal firm standards, accepting new clients, one- and five-year client retention rates, non-institutional discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered, number of client households served.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Holding stocks for the long-term does not ensure a profitable outcome. Investing always involves risk and investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Inclusion of any index is for illustrative purposes only. Individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. C14-036847

Establishing Clear Direction for your Retirement Plan

Retirement planning is an exercise in imagining your future.  We all posses the ability to think ahead and plan for the future; whether it is making plans for tomorrow, arrangements for a trip next year or planning ahead for retirement in 5 years, 10 years or even longer. Thinking ahead allows us to carefully arrange our financial lives to align with our future vision.

Be Ready to Adjust Your Plan

Like life, adjustments will be necessary along the way.   It is more common than you may think for couples to approach retirement with an agreed upon plan, only to have divergent thoughts surface before reaching the goal.  Financial planning and thoughtful conversation can help to reestablish clear direction and a workable plan to follow together. Here is a simplified case study to help illustrate crucial planning steps leading to retirement.

Try 3 Action Steps to Jumpstart Your Plan

When Jack and Sally began to think about retirement, they had more questions than answers.  Sally was looking forward to relaxing and spending time in a warmer climate, while Jack couldn’t imagine moving to another state away from his volunteer work and grandchildren.  This is not a unique situation.  With a goal of retirement in 5 years, we established these three action steps:

• First they needed to review assets, future income sources and anticipated expenses to determine how much money they will need to live their retirement plan.  Increased longevity is factored into the financial analysis.

• They were in agreement to be debt free and have enough assets and income sources that cash flow would not be a limiting factor in retirement.  That gave them a clear picture of how much they needed to save and invest leading up to retirement.

• Jack and Sally agreed they would downsize their home to accommodate the goal of renting in a warmer climate for 5 months during the coldest part of Michigan winters.

Test your pre-retirement plan by laying out your unique objectives to see if you have a clear direction and workable plan to follow together.  The most successful transitions hold the promise of retiring to something, not away from something.  Contact me if you need help getting started or making adjustments along the way to your retirement goals.

Laurie Renchik, CFP®, MBA is a Partner and Senior Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. In addition to working with women who are in the midst of a transition (career change, receiving an inheritance, losing a life partner, divorce or remarriage), Laurie works with clients who are planning for retirement. Laurie was named to the 2013 Five Star Wealth Managers list in Detroit Hour magazine, is a member of the Leadership Oakland Alumni Association and in addition to her frequent contributions to Money Centered, she manages and is a frequent contributor to Center Connections at The Center.

Five Star Award is based on advisor being credentialed as an investment advisory representative (IAR), a FINRA registered representative, a CPA or a licensed attorney, including education and professional designations, actively employed in the industry for five years, favorable regulatory and complaint history review, fulfillment of firm review based on internal firm standards, accepting new clients, one- and five-year client retention rates, non-institutional discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered, number of client households served.

Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James. C14-034237

IMO - In My Opinion: A take on mortgages, Roths, pensions & more

My wife, Jen, and I have been speed watching The Good Wife thanks to Netflix. In The Good Wife, one of the judges (apparently the legal system makes for good TV) constantly requires the lawyers in her courtroom to end their arguments with, “In my opinion.”  The attorneys look bewildered each time as if to say…well of course it’s only my opinion, just like every other statement I make, and everyone knows that except for you, apparently.  A recent consultation reminded me of the “in my opinion” skit (“IMO” for short). 

Professionals Offer Differing Opinions

In our field of professional financial planning (not to be confused with the majority of firms and advisors in the financial SALES industry) there are many rules of thumb, but very few technical standards of care that you might find in the medical or legal field.

As a Certified Financial Planner® practitioner, there are some guiding principles and general statements that CFP® practitioners are expected to display in their professional activities, but they are hardly a technical standard of care. The CFP Board states that “Allowance can be made for innocent error and legitimate differences of opinion, but integrity cannot co-exist with deceit or subordination of one’s principles.” Those legitimate differences of opinion are what I’m talking about.

Differenceofopinion-adisagreementorargumentaboutsomethingimportant

Reasonable minds can and will differ just as in everyday life it is not uncommon to hear reasonable folks say, “Let’s agree to disagree.”  Professional differences of opinion do not render the other professional a crook or even wrong if they are acting from a place of integrity – IMO.  Moreover, it is perfectly appropriate to express a difference of opinion with another financial professional when done in a professional and non disparaging manner – IMO.

Back to my recent consultation – as I listened to the recommendations of another professional, I realized I had several different opinions on what was best for this particular situation and needed to share:

ROTH Conversions: As my colleagues here at The Center can attest, I hold a pretty strong opinion that most people have gotten the Roth Conversion issue “incorrect”.  I believe that many folks have accelerated income taxes at a higher rate than they will pay in the future.  Most workers have a higher income, which usually translates into a higher marginal tax bracket, during their working years than they do in retirement.  But wait; there is no Required Minimum Distribution from a ROTH. True, but this is still only relevant as to what bracket the money comes out.  Don’t get me wrong, this is not an absolutist opinion, there are plenty of correct situations where ROTH’s makes sense (IMO) – look for an upcoming post about converting after tax 401k contributions to a ROTH as an example. There are other limited situations where a ROTH makes sense, IMO.  For example, if you are a high net worth person and reasonably expect that you will always be in the highest marginal bracket, then converting and paying at 35% vs the new 39.6% marginal rate seems to make sense. 

Mortgage vs no mortgage:  A firm attempting to become a national financial planning firm recently counseled a young retiree looking to relocate to another state to, “Get the biggest mortgage possible.” Call us old school – but we think that most retirees are best served entering their retirement years debt free. And this client has substantial taxable funds to complete the purchase.  Our suggestion was to actually RENT initially.  Once they are comfortable and they have found a location that suits them for at least the next 5 years, we think they should consider a cash purchase. Rates are low, which does make obtaining a mortgage more attractive, however in retirement (at age 50) the rate is going to be much higher than any suggested distribution rate (1-3%?).

Pension Lump Sum: Our recommendation is for the client to take a monthly pension at age 55 in the form of a 100% survivor benefit even though her husband is older. The other advisor suggested that even assuming a low return, investing the lump sum will produce more money.  The client suggests that age 94 mortality was very reasonable given her family history.  Under these assumptions, the “low return” needed from the investment portfolio turned out to be 6%; hardly a “low” return IMO. Assuming only a 1% annual difference in return (5%) the lump sum lasts only to age 86.  One of the advantages to taking the lump sum is flexibility or access to a lump sum if needed.  Fortunately, the client’s other assets are substantial. Other more confident professionals might find the hurdle rate low; not me.

401k Rollover:  We both recommended a 401k rollover to an IRA managed by our respective firms.  The client left the employ of a major corporation with what I would categorize as containing a competitive 401k, in terms of investment options and expenses.  My sense is that the client will be better served by rolling the account to either professional.  Successful investment management is more about behavior than selecting the best allocation or underlying securities to complete the allocation – IMO.

Asset Allocation: The other professional recommended a 70% equity and 30% fixed income allocation versus our 60/40 allocation.  My thinking is at this time of their life, less risk is a bit more important.  I do, however, appreciate that because they are so young (hedging against inflation), and their expected withdrawal rate is under 3%, that a higher equity allocation may be reasonable. The other adviser apparently pointed out that their allocation was “optimized” (directly on the efficient frontier) because their mid cap exposure was higher than our recommendation in addition to our international equity allocation being 12% vs their 10% recommendation.  Due to current valuations, we have reduced our allocation to mid and small cap equities from a neutral weighting of 10% down to 8.5% and our international (large developed) is at our target weighting of 12%.  The other professional suggests 14% and 10% respectively.  Only time will tell which portfolio was more successful.  I do feel pretty strongly that in the end our client’s behavior will be more determinative of their investment success versus the subtle differences in portfolio recommendation – IMO.

Annuities:  Do you remember when some advisors called anyone recommending an annuity a crook?  Fast forward a few years and some of the profession’s highly regarded practitioners recommend annuities in many situations.  I still believe that they are way oversold, but that doesn’t mean there are not appropriate situations - IMO.

Everyone has an opinion and I give my clients mine. So, what’s your opinion?

Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.  ~Marcus Aurelius

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a frequent contributor to national media including appearances on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4 News and published articles including Forbes and The Wall Street Journal. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), trained and mentored hundreds of CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

Every investor's situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon before making any investment. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The forgoing is not a recommendation to buy or sell any individual security or any combination of   securities. Be sure to contact a qualified professional regarding your particular situation before making any investment or withdrawal decision.

C14-033719

A ROTH IRA Strategy for High Income Earners

Do you have a 401k Plan from your current employer?  Does it allow you to make after tax contributions (these are different than pretax contributions and Roth 401k contributions)?  If the answer to both is “yes”, a recent IRS notice may present a welcome opportunity.  IRS Notice 2014-54 has provided guidance (positive guidance) allowing the splitting of after tax 401k contributions to a ROTH IRA. Although I believe that ROTH IRAs are used in many less than ideal situations, this is one strategy that can make sense for higher income earners; tax diversification and getting money into a ROTH without a big upfront tax cost. 

After answering “yes” to the first two questions, the next question is, “Are you making maximum contributions on a pretax basis?”  That is, if you are under 50 years old, are you contributing $17,500 and if you are over 50 (the new 30) $23,000? If you are making the maximum contribution, then a second look at after tax contributions should be considered.  Whew – that’s three hoops to jump through – but the benefits might just be worth it.

Putting Notice 2014-54 to Work

For example, Teddy, age 50 has a 401k plan and contributes $23,000 (includes the catch up contribution) and his employer matches $5,000 for a total of $28,000.  Teddy’s plan also allows for after tax contributions and he may contribute $29,000 more up to an IRS limit of $57,000. 

The new IRS Notice makes it clear and simplifies the process allowing this after tax amount at retirement to be rolled into a ROTH IRA.

The bottom line:  It is more attractive to make after tax contributions to your 401k with the flexibility of converting the basis to a ROTH at retirement or separation of employment without the tax hit of an ordinary Roth conversion.

As usual, the nuances are plentiful and your specific circumstances will determine whether this strategy is best for you.  To that end, we are here to help evaluate the opportunity with you.

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a frequent contributor to national media including appearances on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4 News and published articles including Forbes and The Wall Street Journal. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), trained and mentored hundreds of CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. C14-033701

Where are we in the full market cycle?

Cycles exist everywhere.  One of the first cycles we learn about as a child is the water cycle or the journey of a raindrop. There’s something about the circularity of cycles that I just love.

The economy and financial markets also cycle. An economic cycle is the periodic ebb and flow of economic growth like Gross Domestic Product or employment.  According to the National Bureau of Economic Research the average economic cycle lasts a little less than six years.  This span is measured both from one peak to the next peak or one trough to the next trough.  While six years is an average, the cycle can be much quicker or much longer than six years. 

The Cyle of Economic “Seasons”

The various stages of the economic cycle can be thought of like seasons of the year as shown in the chart below.  From winter, or recession, where jobs are lost and the economy is shrinking to summer, where growth is accelerating and jobs have been recovered. 

Every quarter we take a poll at The Center to see where team members think we fall in this spectrum.  Our consensus is that we believe we are in the midst of summer meaning that this bull still has some room to go as we are still lacking some keys signs of a maturing economy like inflation and volatility.

Stock Market Cycles

The stock market also goes through cycles and, along with it, investor emotions ebb and flow.  Usually the stock market cycle is slightly ahead of the economic cycle meaning that market indexes often peak before the economic cycle peaks.  Our latest survey of our employees placed the stock market cycle near excitement in the picture below.  At this point (excitement/thrill/euphoria) investors start to question why they don’t have more aggressive positions because they have clearly performed very well and many even start to shift their portfolios in this direction.  As Warren Buffett said”

“Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.”

Refocusing on the Long Term

This is the point when it is most important to stay in a diversified portfolio, not abandon your long-term investment objectives while reaching for more returns. Rebalancing at these market extremes may go against what investors want to do, for example, selling your stock positions to buy more bonds right now or selling your bonds in 2009 to buy more stocks. However, going against these basic emotions have potential to be the best decisions you can make for your portfolio.  Navigating these emotions is the single most difficult road block to the success of an investment strategy.  While markets and economies will cycle as long as water continues to cycle, having sound financial advice during these market extremes can make big difference in the success of your long-term financial plans. 

Angela Palacios, CFP®is the Portfolio Manager at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor to Money Centered as well asinvestment updates at The Center.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or loss regardless ofstrategy selected. C14-031971

Want to be a Genius when it comes to Retirement?

My friend* and fellow professional Marc Freedman, CFP® recently published his first book Retiring for the Genius®. The two subtitles capture the essence of the book: “Your Blueprint for Planning a Comfortable Retirement” designed “For the Genius in All of Us™”. I had the honor of providing a peer review during editing and, according to the Author’s Acknowledgement, provided “invaluable and honest insights.” Writing a book is an admirable undertaking and it was truly an honor and pleasure playing a very small role.

Retiring for the Genius® is very comprehensive, covering almost 400 pages of text. Marc addresses an enormous amount of content including social security, income taxes, designing retirement income, estate planning; Marc covers it all. Fortunately there’s an array of summaries, examples and “inspiration” tips to keep the material interesting and practical.  Marc accomplished his goal of providing meaningful content that we all can understand and implement. Give it a read.

*In the spirit of full disclosure, I need to define “friend”.  Marc and I are Facebook friends, and according to my three kids, that means in 2014 we are almost like family.  More importantly, we both served the Board of Directors of the Financial Planning Association and its 25,000 members about a decade ago. I came to honor his knowledge and passion for serving his clients and the financial planning profession. Congrats my friend!

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a frequent contributor to national media including appearances on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4 News and published articles including Forbes and The Wall Street Journal. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), trained and mentored hundreds of CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website’s users and/or members. C14-026543

Factoring the Cost of Living in a Post-Retirement Relocation

Your retirement plan may involve a move. You could be moving some place warm so you don’t have to put up with the wonderful Michigan winters or perhaps moving to be closer to your kids and grandkids.  Whatever the motivation, there is always a financial component in the decision-making process.

Paying for what you want vs. what you need

The cost to live in other areas of the country can be higher or lower, but some people don’t know the specific figures you will probably pay after you make the move.  Is a dollar in Michigan the same as a dollar in California or Utah? A recent conversation with a client evaluating relocating placed focus on this specific issue. His thinking was that it didn’t matter where you lived, you can always find a way to spend money.  While I certainly have to agree with him on that point, I think the bigger point is that there is a difference between spending money on things you want versus spending money on things you need.

Comparing Expenses

Let’s take a look at the cost of different goods and services in the two cities. These figures were taken from www.costofliving.org and they are an average estimate taken from people who live in Salt Lake City and San Francisco. The list of goods and services has more than 75 commonly purchased or used items but we’ll look at just a sampling of expenses.

As you can see, everything in San Fran is more expensive except the T-Bone steak. Unfortunately, after you pay for your basic living expenses, you might not have any money left over for that T-Bone! According to the living expense calculator on www.costofliving.org someone living on $70,000 of net income in Livonia, Michigan would need approximately $120,000 net in San Francisco.  In Salt Lake City, that same person would only need $69,000 to maintain the same standard of living. 

If you think a move might be in your future, talk to your financial advisor to weigh the costs associated with the new location and make sure it fits within your retirement income goal.

Matthew Trujillo, CFP®, is a Certified Financial Planner™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Matt currently assists Center planners and clients, and is a contributor to Money Centered.

Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. C14-022592

Is Retirement Too Late to Find a Financial Planner?

Let’s say you are approaching retirement or you have already taken the plunge. Let’s also say you have not worked with a financial planner along the way. Is there a reason to consider forming a relationship at this stage of the game? 

Even at this stage in life, it may help to seek out a financial planner to be a thinking partner leading up to and along your retirement journey. But finding the right fit may not be easy. A successful financial planning engagement starts with you figuring out what is most important.  Details about your money are equally as important when put in context with your envisioned life. 

Here are two steps that will help you pull together your overall financial picture:

1. Create a financial plan: This will be a roadmap to help you see your financial picture in one coordinated view. 

• This plan is all about you, your priorities and needs.  The goal is to help you feel secure and at ease about your financial future.

• It will show you how you are currently invested and make suggestions for appropriate changes.

• Analyze how your investments could be working to supplement your income, either on a regular basis or as needs arise.

• Make sure that your estate plan is the way you want it. 

2. Consolidate: If your accounts are spread around with many different companies, it may come with a financial and organizational cost.

• With consolidation you can easily access all of your information in one place.

• You’ll simplify the ongoing paperwork you receive and streamline information gathering at tax time and when you must take required distributions.

• It provides more consistent management and ongoing monitoring in a cohesive framework.

Even if you have the individual areas of your finances under control, it is still important to pull all the pieces together.  Perhaps you have multiple IRA’s that too closely mirror each other, investments you have inherited that aren’t worked into your overall strategy, or your life circumstances have changed and your investments have not. 

The right fit might take some trial and error.  You don’t have to settle.  A financial planner that truly understands your financial story will be able to guide you to think about areas of your financial life you may not have considered up to this point. If you’re nearing, at, or past retirement and need help exploring your financial planning options, don’t hesitate to contact me about building a relationship and shaping your plan.

Laurie Renchik, CFP®, MBA is a Partner and Senior Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. In addition to working with women who are in the midst of a transition (career change, receiving an inheritance, losing a life partner, divorce or remarriage), Laurie works with clients who are planning for retirement. Laurie was named to the 2013 Five Star Wealth Managers list in Detroit Hour magazine, is a member of the Leadership Oakland Alumni Association and in addition to her frequent contributions to Money Centered, she manages and is a frequent contributor to Center Connections at The Center.

Five Star Award is based on advisor being credentialed as an investment advisory representative (IAR), a FINRA registered representative, a CPA or a licensed attorney, including education and professional designations, actively employed in the industry for five years, favorable regulatory and complaint history review, fulfillment of firm review based on internal firm standards, accepting new clients, one- and five-year client retention rates, non-institutional discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered, number of client households served.

Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James. You should compare your current and prospective account features, including any fees and charges, before making consolidation decisions. This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. C14-022519

Is 40 the “Magic” Age for Financial Planning?

When is Financial Planning, on your own or with the help of a professional, appropriate? The correct answer is you should probably begin saving the first day that you receive your first paycheck.  However, in my 23 years of experience, folks tend to get “serious” about planning near the age of 40.  I do not by any means want to discourage anyone younger than 40 to put off planning until they hit that “magic” 40 milestone. Just about anyone that has achieved financial success will tell you to start as early as possible.

Some questions and issues that the 40+ crowd might consider: 

• How much should I be saving? I have heard rules of thumb such as 10% or 20% but what does that mean for me and my specific goals?

• I’m busy. What are the options to pay bills other than the standard envelope and stamp method?

• Life insurance: Salespeople have been hounding me for years to buy life insurance. I couldn’t afford it in the past and secretly didn’t see the value, but I’m ready now. What type and amount should I get to protect my family so I am not insurance rich and cash poor?

• College: My kids are getting closer to college age. How do I pay the ever-increasing tuition?

• I am ready to invest my wealth. What are best options for me?  Should I max out my 401k or 403b or is a ROTH a better option?

• Estate planning: I’m all grow’d up now and ready (I think) to consider a Will and perhaps a Living Trust. How do I know which one I need?

• My parents are aging and I am not sure if they have the resources for their care. What should I be doing now to prepare or help them prepare?

• I have heard about the “Boomerang kids” phenomenon. Should I move to a one bedroom condo now?

• Employer retirement plans (401k/403b): Whoa, I have real money now! How should it be invested?

• I give to charities that are making a difference in the world. Is there a way to maximize my donations and perhaps even get a tax break?

• Income taxes: I don’t mind paying … I just don’t want to pay a cent more than my share. How can I limit my income tax exposure?

• If I choose to work with a professional financial planner whom should I contact? I have not have worked with a professional advisor yet so I am a bit leery, and maybe even a bit scared to share my financial picture (not sure how I stack up with others).

If you’ve been asking yourself some of these questions, no matter your age, you are ready to get “serious” about your financial life.  Think about some of the issues and questions that you find yourself facing and feel free to give me an email. If my 23 years of working with similar folks can be of help, I’d love to share my insight because you don’t need to wait for some “magic” age.

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a frequent contributor to national media including appearances on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4 News and published articles including Forbes and The Wall Street Journal. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), trained and mentored hundreds of CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

C14-019069

Tax Update: Borrowing from Retirement to Buy a Home

There may come a time in your life when you simply need some money. As a general rule, taking money from an IRA, 401k, or other retirement plan for “non-retirement” purposes is ill advised.  However, there can be some exceptions.  Perhaps you bought a home without selling your current one and need funds to bridge the closing dates.  The IRS allows you to withdraw funds from an IRA and avoid income taxes and a 10% penalty (if under age 59.5) by rolling the money back into the IRA within 60 days.  This can be done once every 12 months. The gray area had been whether the 12-month rollover applies to each separate IRA or to all of your IRAs. In February 2014 a court ruling stated that this rule applies on an aggregate basis for all of your IRAs.  Therefore, the strategy can still be used, but proper planning will be even more important in order to make sure the transaction is nontaxable.

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a frequent contributor to national media including appearances on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4 News and published articles including Forbes and The Wall Street Journal. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), trained and mentored hundreds of CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. C14-011297