3 Reasons Municipal Bonds are Darlings of the Year

While bond returns have astounded investors so far this year, many are left scratching their heads wondering if interest rates are ever going to rise creating the “Bond Armageddon” that has been so highly anticipated.  On November 17th the Barclays US Aggregate Bond index total return has returned 5.13% year-to-date1.  While that is certainly an attractive return on something that was destined to be down this year, municipal bonds have astounded even more.  As of November 17th the Barclays Municipal total return index1 has experienced a cool 8.06% return.  Is it time then to give up on municipal bonds after this return that seems like it should be unreal?  The short answer is no.

Why not to give up on municipal bonds

The municipal bond market offers three unique traits that continue to make it attractive. 

1. Taxes:  Paying taxes are always a concern for investors, so the tax advantaged nature of municipal bonds continue to make them attractive, especially as tax rates increase for the wealthy.

2. Supply is limited:  The chart below demonstrates how the number of municipal bonds available to purchase is getting smaller.  The light teal bar below zero shows the amount of bonds each month that have been redeemed (called away or matured giving the investor their principal back).  The purple bar above shows the number of new bonds being issued each month.  The blue line shows the net number of issues or redemptions (number of new issues subtracting the number of redemptions).  In most months over 2012 and 2013, the number is negative meaning the number of bonds out there for investors to purchase is getting smaller.  A limited supply with demand that stays steady or increases can create positive returns for bondholders.

Source: Columbia Management

3. Yields: When comparing two bonds of similar quality (bond rating) and the municipal bond is yielding about the same or more and the interest is tax free2, which bond would you choose?  Many investors have made that very same decision.

Three main things to consider before investing in municipal bonds:

• May provide a lower yield than comparable investments

• Are likely not suitable for investors who do not stand to benefit from the tax advantages

• Are subject to certain risks, including interest rate, credit, legislative, reinvestment and valuation risks

As with any investment, the decision to own municipal bonds is not one to be taken lightly.  As always don’t hesitate to ask us to see if they make sense for your portfolio. 

Angela Palacios, CFP®is the Portfolio Manager at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor to Money Centered as well asinvestment updates at The Center.

1: Source: Morningstar Direct. Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index represents investment grade bonds being traded in United States. Barclays Municipal total return index represents the broad market for investment grade, tax-exempt bonds with a maturity of at least one year. Individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

2: Municipal bond interest is not subject to federal income tax but may be subject to AMT, state or local taxes. Income from taxable municipal bonds is subject to federal income taxation; and it may be subject to state and local taxes. Please consult an income tax professional to assess the impact of holding such securities on your tax liability.

The market value of municipal bonds may fluctuate and, if sold prior to maturity, the price you receive may be more or less than the original purchase price or maturity value. There is an inverse relationship between interest rate movements and fixed income prices. This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. C14-036843

An Easy Guide to Year-End Tax Planning

With the end of the year fast approaching, tax planning is top of mind for many clients.  At The Center, we are proactive throughout the entire year when it comes to evaluating a client’s current and projected tax situation, but now is typically the time most people really start thinking about it.  We like to share this simple checklistthat we feel is very user friendly and a good guide to evaluating your tax situation for the year.  Let’s be honest, does anyone feel like they don’t pay ENOUGH tax?  Most clients want to lower their tax bill and be as efficient with their dollars as possible. 

Questions to Consider

Here are some questions we ask clients that could ultimately help save money at tax time:

• Are you currently maximizing your company retirement account (401k, 403b, Simple IRA, SEP-IRA, etc.)?

  • These plans allow for the largest contributions and are deductible against income

    • In our eyes, this is often the most favorable way to reduce taxes because it also goes towards funding your retirement goals! 

    • How are you making charitable donations?  Are you writing checks or gifting appreciated securities?

      • Gifting appreciated securities to charity allows you to avoid paying capital gains but still receive a charitable deduction – a pretty good deal if you ask me!

        • Donor Advised Funds are a great way to facilitate this transfer and are becoming increasingly popular lately because of the ease of use and flexibility they provide for those who are charitably inclined – take a look at Matt Trujillo’s recent blog on this great tool.

        • Should I be contributing to an IRA?  If so, should I put money in a Traditional or Roth?

          • These are fantastic tools to help fund medical and dependent care costs in a tax-efficient manner

            • HSAs can only be used, however, if you are covered under a high-deductible health plan and FSAs are “use it or lose it” plans, meaning money contributed into the account is lost if it’s not used throughout the year – take a look at the blog I wrote earlier this year that goes into greater detail on the advantages and disadvantages of HSAs and FSAs

This is a busy time of year for everyone.  Between holiday shopping, traveling, spending time with family, and completing year-end tasks at work, taxes can get lost in the shuffle.  We encourage you to check out the link we’ve provided that will hopefully give you some guidance with your personal tax situation.  Although we are not CPAs, tax planning is something we feel is extremely important.  We would love to hear from you if you have any questions or ideas you’d like to discuss with us!

Nick Defenthaler, CFP® is a Certified Financial Planner™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Nick currently assists Center planners and clients, and is a contributor to Money Centered and Center Connections.

Please note, changes in tax laws or regulations may occur at any time and could substantially impact your situation. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Raymond James financial advisors, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. C14-037860

IMO - In My Opinion: A take on mortgages, Roths, pensions & more

My wife, Jen, and I have been speed watching The Good Wife thanks to Netflix. In The Good Wife, one of the judges (apparently the legal system makes for good TV) constantly requires the lawyers in her courtroom to end their arguments with, “In my opinion.”  The attorneys look bewildered each time as if to say…well of course it’s only my opinion, just like every other statement I make, and everyone knows that except for you, apparently.  A recent consultation reminded me of the “in my opinion” skit (“IMO” for short). 

Professionals Offer Differing Opinions

In our field of professional financial planning (not to be confused with the majority of firms and advisors in the financial SALES industry) there are many rules of thumb, but very few technical standards of care that you might find in the medical or legal field.

As a Certified Financial Planner® practitioner, there are some guiding principles and general statements that CFP® practitioners are expected to display in their professional activities, but they are hardly a technical standard of care. The CFP Board states that “Allowance can be made for innocent error and legitimate differences of opinion, but integrity cannot co-exist with deceit or subordination of one’s principles.” Those legitimate differences of opinion are what I’m talking about.

Differenceofopinion-adisagreementorargumentaboutsomethingimportant

Reasonable minds can and will differ just as in everyday life it is not uncommon to hear reasonable folks say, “Let’s agree to disagree.”  Professional differences of opinion do not render the other professional a crook or even wrong if they are acting from a place of integrity – IMO.  Moreover, it is perfectly appropriate to express a difference of opinion with another financial professional when done in a professional and non disparaging manner – IMO.

Back to my recent consultation – as I listened to the recommendations of another professional, I realized I had several different opinions on what was best for this particular situation and needed to share:

ROTH Conversions: As my colleagues here at The Center can attest, I hold a pretty strong opinion that most people have gotten the Roth Conversion issue “incorrect”.  I believe that many folks have accelerated income taxes at a higher rate than they will pay in the future.  Most workers have a higher income, which usually translates into a higher marginal tax bracket, during their working years than they do in retirement.  But wait; there is no Required Minimum Distribution from a ROTH. True, but this is still only relevant as to what bracket the money comes out.  Don’t get me wrong, this is not an absolutist opinion, there are plenty of correct situations where ROTH’s makes sense (IMO) – look for an upcoming post about converting after tax 401k contributions to a ROTH as an example. There are other limited situations where a ROTH makes sense, IMO.  For example, if you are a high net worth person and reasonably expect that you will always be in the highest marginal bracket, then converting and paying at 35% vs the new 39.6% marginal rate seems to make sense. 

Mortgage vs no mortgage:  A firm attempting to become a national financial planning firm recently counseled a young retiree looking to relocate to another state to, “Get the biggest mortgage possible.” Call us old school – but we think that most retirees are best served entering their retirement years debt free. And this client has substantial taxable funds to complete the purchase.  Our suggestion was to actually RENT initially.  Once they are comfortable and they have found a location that suits them for at least the next 5 years, we think they should consider a cash purchase. Rates are low, which does make obtaining a mortgage more attractive, however in retirement (at age 50) the rate is going to be much higher than any suggested distribution rate (1-3%?).

Pension Lump Sum: Our recommendation is for the client to take a monthly pension at age 55 in the form of a 100% survivor benefit even though her husband is older. The other advisor suggested that even assuming a low return, investing the lump sum will produce more money.  The client suggests that age 94 mortality was very reasonable given her family history.  Under these assumptions, the “low return” needed from the investment portfolio turned out to be 6%; hardly a “low” return IMO. Assuming only a 1% annual difference in return (5%) the lump sum lasts only to age 86.  One of the advantages to taking the lump sum is flexibility or access to a lump sum if needed.  Fortunately, the client’s other assets are substantial. Other more confident professionals might find the hurdle rate low; not me.

401k Rollover:  We both recommended a 401k rollover to an IRA managed by our respective firms.  The client left the employ of a major corporation with what I would categorize as containing a competitive 401k, in terms of investment options and expenses.  My sense is that the client will be better served by rolling the account to either professional.  Successful investment management is more about behavior than selecting the best allocation or underlying securities to complete the allocation – IMO.

Asset Allocation: The other professional recommended a 70% equity and 30% fixed income allocation versus our 60/40 allocation.  My thinking is at this time of their life, less risk is a bit more important.  I do, however, appreciate that because they are so young (hedging against inflation), and their expected withdrawal rate is under 3%, that a higher equity allocation may be reasonable. The other adviser apparently pointed out that their allocation was “optimized” (directly on the efficient frontier) because their mid cap exposure was higher than our recommendation in addition to our international equity allocation being 12% vs their 10% recommendation.  Due to current valuations, we have reduced our allocation to mid and small cap equities from a neutral weighting of 10% down to 8.5% and our international (large developed) is at our target weighting of 12%.  The other professional suggests 14% and 10% respectively.  Only time will tell which portfolio was more successful.  I do feel pretty strongly that in the end our client’s behavior will be more determinative of their investment success versus the subtle differences in portfolio recommendation – IMO.

Annuities:  Do you remember when some advisors called anyone recommending an annuity a crook?  Fast forward a few years and some of the profession’s highly regarded practitioners recommend annuities in many situations.  I still believe that they are way oversold, but that doesn’t mean there are not appropriate situations - IMO.

Everyone has an opinion and I give my clients mine. So, what’s your opinion?

Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.  ~Marcus Aurelius

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a frequent contributor to national media including appearances on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4 News and published articles including Forbes and The Wall Street Journal. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), trained and mentored hundreds of CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

Every investor's situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon before making any investment. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The forgoing is not a recommendation to buy or sell any individual security or any combination of   securities. Be sure to contact a qualified professional regarding your particular situation before making any investment or withdrawal decision.

C14-033719

A ROTH IRA Strategy for High Income Earners

Do you have a 401k Plan from your current employer?  Does it allow you to make after tax contributions (these are different than pretax contributions and Roth 401k contributions)?  If the answer to both is “yes”, a recent IRS notice may present a welcome opportunity.  IRS Notice 2014-54 has provided guidance (positive guidance) allowing the splitting of after tax 401k contributions to a ROTH IRA. Although I believe that ROTH IRAs are used in many less than ideal situations, this is one strategy that can make sense for higher income earners; tax diversification and getting money into a ROTH without a big upfront tax cost. 

After answering “yes” to the first two questions, the next question is, “Are you making maximum contributions on a pretax basis?”  That is, if you are under 50 years old, are you contributing $17,500 and if you are over 50 (the new 30) $23,000? If you are making the maximum contribution, then a second look at after tax contributions should be considered.  Whew – that’s three hoops to jump through – but the benefits might just be worth it.

Putting Notice 2014-54 to Work

For example, Teddy, age 50 has a 401k plan and contributes $23,000 (includes the catch up contribution) and his employer matches $5,000 for a total of $28,000.  Teddy’s plan also allows for after tax contributions and he may contribute $29,000 more up to an IRS limit of $57,000. 

The new IRS Notice makes it clear and simplifies the process allowing this after tax amount at retirement to be rolled into a ROTH IRA.

The bottom line:  It is more attractive to make after tax contributions to your 401k with the flexibility of converting the basis to a ROTH at retirement or separation of employment without the tax hit of an ordinary Roth conversion.

As usual, the nuances are plentiful and your specific circumstances will determine whether this strategy is best for you.  To that end, we are here to help evaluate the opportunity with you.

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a frequent contributor to national media including appearances on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4 News and published articles including Forbes and The Wall Street Journal. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), trained and mentored hundreds of CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. C14-033701

Is the Saver’s Credit one of the IRS’ best-kept secrets?

Saving money is tough.  There are so many ways in life to spend money and you can easily find excuses for not contributing to a 401k or an IRA.  But what if someone gave you money at the end of the year as a “reward” for doing the smart thing and saving for retirement?  Would that entice you to begin saving?  Enter what’s known as the “Saver’s Credit” to help you do just that!

What is the Saver’s Credit?

The Retirement Savings Contributions Credit (aka the Saver’s Credit) was enacted in 2001 as part of President Bush’s tax cuts, however, many folks are simply not aware it exists.  The Saver’s Credit applies to contributions made to qualified retirement plans (401k, 403b, 457) or to a Roth IRA or Traditional IRA.  To qualify for the credit, adjusted gross income (AGI) must be below $60,000 for married couples or $30,000 for single filers.  The maximum credit available is $1,000 and is a non-refundable credit. For more details check out the IRS website.

A Tax Credit vs. A Tax Deduction

A tax credit is typically more beneficial than a tax deduction, especially for those with income within the required parameters.  For example, if you’re in the 15% tax bracket and received a $1,000 tax deduction, the true tax reduction would be about $150 ($1,000 x 15%).  A tax credit, on the other hand, is a dollar for dollar reduction of tax liability.  For example, if you received the $1,000 maximum “Saver’s Credit” and your total tax liability on the year was $3,000; you would only owe $2,000 in tax. 

How do I claim the Saver’s Credit?

If you fit the AGI parameters, you need to complete form 8800.  Make sure your tax professional or tax software program is generating this form for you to make sure you are taking advantage of the credit.  Many tax software programs that offer free services are for very simple returns (1040EZ), so always be sure that the type of return you are purchasing will, in fact, allow you to take the deductions and credits that are applicable to your situation.

Who can take advantage of this tax credit?

Personally, I see this as a great opportunity for recent college graduates who are entering the work force and have “retirement savings” as number 24 on their “top 25 ways to use my paycheck”.  Many are starting off earning an income that falls within the range to take advantage of the credit and are just simply not aware that this incentive exists to save for retirement.  This is also a great opportunity for parents or grandparents to consider gifting to the young adult so they can take advantage of the credit if they simply cannot afford to make any type of retirement contribution currently.  One stipulation the parent or grandparent may put on the gift is that any added tax refund from the credit needs to be re-deposited into a retirement account.  It’s a great way to begin good savings habits that will hopefully last a lifetime!

Need more information on how to put this tax credit to work for you? Please contact me and we’ll take a look at your personal case to see if the Saver’s Credit is an option.

Nick Defenthaler, CFP® is a Certified Financial Planner™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Nick currently assists Center planners and clients, and is a contributor to Money Centered and Center Connections.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Consult a tax professional for any tax matters. C14-023683

Tips to Help Avoid a Tax Audit

Nothing gets the blood pumping like a notice from the IRS letting you know you’re in for a tax audit.  According to Kipplinger Magazine, there are signs some tax payers are more susceptible to audits than others. 

Here are some red flags for the IRS:

1. High income: Incomes over $200,000 are 26% more likely to be audited, as well as one in nine persons earning over $1 million dollars.

2. Failing to report all taxable income:  Tax payers forget the IRS gets copies of all 1099’s and a mismatch sends a red flag.

3. Taking large charitable deductions:  Be sure you know the rules regarding various kinds of charitable gifts and you can document not only the amounts given but the charities as well.

4. Business write-offs: Deducting business meals, travel and other expenses.  Again, there are guidelines on what you may and may not deduct—be sure to follow them.

5. Claiming 100% business use of vehicle:  Very few workers use their car for business all the time.

6. Taking alimony deductions:  These deductions can only be taken when made part of a separation or divorce decree---not arbitrarily.

7. Running a small business:  The IRS is well aware there are many opportunities for tax deductions but again the rules are precise—follow them.

8. Failing to report a foreign bank account:  New rules have gone into effect in 2014. Foreign bank accounts will require registrations and will be reported to the IRS.

9. Engaging in currency transactions:  Cash deposits and withdrawals over $10,000 are reported—be ready to explain.

10. Taking higher than average deductions:  The IRS has estimated percentages of deductions they deem “average” for various income levels.  If your deductions fall outside these estimates, be ready to explain.

If you have any of the above deductions, have detailed documentation on the what, when and why of your deductions.  Good record keeping can help make the audit go away as easily as it was announced.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. C14-022520

Is 40 the “Magic” Age for Financial Planning?

When is Financial Planning, on your own or with the help of a professional, appropriate? The correct answer is you should probably begin saving the first day that you receive your first paycheck.  However, in my 23 years of experience, folks tend to get “serious” about planning near the age of 40.  I do not by any means want to discourage anyone younger than 40 to put off planning until they hit that “magic” 40 milestone. Just about anyone that has achieved financial success will tell you to start as early as possible.

Some questions and issues that the 40+ crowd might consider: 

• How much should I be saving? I have heard rules of thumb such as 10% or 20% but what does that mean for me and my specific goals?

• I’m busy. What are the options to pay bills other than the standard envelope and stamp method?

• Life insurance: Salespeople have been hounding me for years to buy life insurance. I couldn’t afford it in the past and secretly didn’t see the value, but I’m ready now. What type and amount should I get to protect my family so I am not insurance rich and cash poor?

• College: My kids are getting closer to college age. How do I pay the ever-increasing tuition?

• I am ready to invest my wealth. What are best options for me?  Should I max out my 401k or 403b or is a ROTH a better option?

• Estate planning: I’m all grow’d up now and ready (I think) to consider a Will and perhaps a Living Trust. How do I know which one I need?

• My parents are aging and I am not sure if they have the resources for their care. What should I be doing now to prepare or help them prepare?

• I have heard about the “Boomerang kids” phenomenon. Should I move to a one bedroom condo now?

• Employer retirement plans (401k/403b): Whoa, I have real money now! How should it be invested?

• I give to charities that are making a difference in the world. Is there a way to maximize my donations and perhaps even get a tax break?

• Income taxes: I don’t mind paying … I just don’t want to pay a cent more than my share. How can I limit my income tax exposure?

• If I choose to work with a professional financial planner whom should I contact? I have not have worked with a professional advisor yet so I am a bit leery, and maybe even a bit scared to share my financial picture (not sure how I stack up with others).

If you’ve been asking yourself some of these questions, no matter your age, you are ready to get “serious” about your financial life.  Think about some of the issues and questions that you find yourself facing and feel free to give me an email. If my 23 years of working with similar folks can be of help, I’d love to share my insight because you don’t need to wait for some “magic” age.

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a frequent contributor to national media including appearances on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4 News and published articles including Forbes and The Wall Street Journal. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), trained and mentored hundreds of CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

C14-019069

Tax Update: Borrowing from Retirement to Buy a Home

There may come a time in your life when you simply need some money. As a general rule, taking money from an IRA, 401k, or other retirement plan for “non-retirement” purposes is ill advised.  However, there can be some exceptions.  Perhaps you bought a home without selling your current one and need funds to bridge the closing dates.  The IRS allows you to withdraw funds from an IRA and avoid income taxes and a 10% penalty (if under age 59.5) by rolling the money back into the IRA within 60 days.  This can be done once every 12 months. The gray area had been whether the 12-month rollover applies to each separate IRA or to all of your IRAs. In February 2014 a court ruling stated that this rule applies on an aggregate basis for all of your IRAs.  Therefore, the strategy can still be used, but proper planning will be even more important in order to make sure the transaction is nontaxable.

Timothy Wyman, CFP®, JD is the Managing Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and is a frequent contributor to national media including appearances on Good Morning America Weekend Edition and WDIV Channel 4 News and published articles including Forbes and The Wall Street Journal. A leader in his profession, Tim served on the National Board of Directors for the 28,000 member Financial Planning Association™ (FPA®), trained and mentored hundreds of CFP® practitioners and is a frequent speaker to organizations and businesses on various financial planning topics.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. C14-011297

Sharing Your Tax Documents with Your Financial Planner

Dear Diary,

In 2013, I worked hard and got that raise I was hoping for. But when it came to filing taxes …

I like to refer to a tax return as a “financial diary”.It contains so much valuable and personal financial information – how much you made last year working, capital gains/loss, interest, dividends, IRA distributions, Social Security benefits, pension benefits, taxable income, your marginal vs. effective tax rate, just to name a few.All of these items help guide us throughout the year to make strategic investment and planning recommendations, based on your current and projected tax situation.As financial planners, we look at your return as a “diary” of what happened in your financial life last year that could help us take advantage of planning opportunities in the future. We do not let taxes be the sole driver in any investment or financial planning decision, however, as comprehensive advisors; tax planning is an integral part of our process of determining what financial choices will benefit you the most.

A team approach adds value for clients

We partner with many tax professionals to keep us all on the same page.By coordinating with other experts, we work as a team to better serve you, our clients.For example, if we are considering completing a Roth IRA conversion for a client, we will contact the client’s tax advisor to get his or her opinion on the conversion and estimate any tax liability or other ramifications.With so many moving parts in financial planning, being able to speak to other experts is key to providing great service and value to clients.

Sharing your “diary” made simple

Because taxes are such an important part of financial planning, we request that clients send us their most recent return once completed each year.Typically, this is something most clients will send to us prior to their annual meeting, however, the sooner we can get them, the better.This allows us to spend more time taking a closer look at the return to see if there are any potential planning opportunities that we can help uncover.We also now have the option for clients to sign a form that authorizes us to contact your CPA or tax advisor directly to have them send us your return once filed to save you any time and hassle it may create.Our goal is to take as much off your plate as possible to make life easier on you.

If you ever have questions on your tax situation or would like to speak to us in greater detail about financial planning, please don’t hesitate to contact us. We are here to help!

Nick Defenthaler, CFP® is a Support Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Nick currently assists Center planners and clients, and is a contributor to Money Centered and Center Connections.

You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Avoiding Double Taxation of IRA Contributions

In my previous blogI described some of the rules surrounding making and deducting IRA contributions.   If you are over the IRS income thresholds, you can still make the IRA contribution, you just won’t be able to deduct it on your taxes – the contribution would be made with after-tax dollars.  This is where tax form 8606 comes into play. 

What is Tax Form 8606?

You are required to file Form 8606 when you make a non-deductible IRA contribution; this tax form will document the contribution amount for the current year.  It must also be filed with your taxes when you withdraw funds from an IRA in which non-deductible contributions were made.  If you don’t file this important tax form, when you go to withdraw funds you’ll face tax consequences. Any amount you contributed that did not receive a tax deduction (after-tax dollar contributions) will be treated as if it did, in fact, receive a tax-deduction and you will be taxed AGAIN on the money.  If you do file form 8606 properly, when you go to take a distribution, a portion will be taxable (any earnings) and a portion will not (return of original after-tax contribution). 

Is your head spinning yet?  Things get confusing quickly and mistakes can happen VERY easily when making non-deductible IRA contributions. Those mistakes could potentially result in double taxation of contributions that could cost investors substantial amounts of money over the course of their retirement.   Not many people want to deal with tracking contributions over the course of a career and will elect to not make non-deductible IRA contributions because of the potential administrative nightmare it can create.  

Non-deductible IRA Alternatives

So what else is there if you have additional funds to invest beyond maxing out a company retirement plan?  If your income is within the IRS limits, you could consider contributing to a Roth IRA.  As with a non-deductible IRA, contributions are made with after-tax dollars. However, all withdrawals, including earnings are not taxable if a qualified distribution occurs.  If income is too high for Roth contributions, you still might be able to contribute by utilizing the “back door” conversion strategy.  If you are phased out from the Roth because of your high income (a good problem to have!) and you don’t fit the mold for a Roth conversion, you could consider opening a taxable brokerage account. Those funds would not grow tax-deferred, but withdrawals would not be included in ordinary income like an IRA because you never received a tax deduction on the contributions.   

As you can see, there are many subtle nuances of different types of retirement and investment accounts.  Your planner can help you identify which accounts make the most sense for you based on your current and projected financial situation.  Working with someone you trust thoroughly to help you make these decisions is imperative and is something we deeply care about at The Center.

Nick Defenthaler, CFP® is a Support Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Nick currently assists Center planners and clients, and is a contributor to Money Centered and Center Connections.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc. and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Unless certain criteria are met, Roth IRA owners must be 59 ½ or older and have held the IRA for five years before tax-free withdrawals are permitted. Converting a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA has tax implications. Changes in tax laws may occur at any time and could have a substantial impact upon each person’s situation. As Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax matters. You should discuss tax matters with the appropriate professional. C14-009867