Investor Ph.D.: Sequence of Returns

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

When planning for our goals, we often think in terms of “What return will we average over time?” But does it matter what pattern these returns happen in? What if they are choppy or we experience very negative returns right before we need the money or as we are drawing it? The answer can be startlingly different depending on what phase of your goal you are in.

If you are accumulating for a future goal the sequence of how to help achieve your returns in general doesn’t matter as long as you average what you need at the end. Look at the following example:

Source: Blackrock

The chart below shows two 30-year income scenarios. The solid line shows a withdrawal plan that started off with three years of negative returns in a row. The dotted line repre­sents a withdrawal plan with the negative years at the end. Both plans started with $250,000 and both took out $12,500 per year inflated by 3% for inflation. No other actions were taken to manage income withdrawals. Both plans had a 6.6% average annual rate of return on the underlying investment for the 30-year period.

These nuances are why it is critical to work with a financial planner to plan for and pursue your goals!

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios, CFP®, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

Investor Basics: Drawdowns 101

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth

It is imperative to try to avoid major drawdowns when investing. This may seem intuitive, but let’s take a closer look.

Drawdown is a metric used to measure risk. It is a measure of the peak-to-trough decline of an investment or portfolio. Minimizing drawdown is arguably more important than seeking large returns when it comes to investing, and here is why:

Below is a simple chart showing the returns investors would need to get back to where they started if they lost 10%, 30%, and 50%. The math is relatively simple: if you start with $100 and proceed to lose 50%, you now have $50. In order to get back to the $100 that you started with, your $50 would have to gain $50, or increase by 100%.

So the math is simple, but who really cares about the hypothetical? Let’s look at how the S&P 500 actually performed compared to diversified portfolios during the drawdown that started in ’07. The chart below, from JPMorgan’s Guide to the Markets, shows how the S&P 500 lost over 50%, and took 3 FULL YEARS before it recovered back to its peak. Compare that to the 40/60 portfolio. Since the drawdown was significantly less, it was a much quicker recovery and broke even after just 6 months. This is why it is important to try to avoid major drawdowns when investing.

For a more in depth look on drawdowns and sequence of returns, check out the Investor PhD blog written by our Director of Investments, Angela Palacios, CFP®.

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Boguth and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investment Lessons of 2016

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson

As we embrace the fresh start of a new year, it is important that we retrace our steps to learn from our investment victories and missteps during 2016. I’m optimistic that reflection can help us become better investors in 2017.

A Look Back on 2016 Market Performance:

• First Quarter: US large equities beat US small and mid-equities (SMIDs) in the first quarter as both had positive runs. We witnessed value stocks shifting to outperform growth stocks and commodities make a comeback. Meanwhile, gold became one of the best performing assets. 

• Second Quarter: All three domestic market caps continued to have positive returns with U.S. SMIDs beginning to overtake U.S. large equities. Taking advantage of an improved energy sector, high yield bonds performed well. Emerging markets had both ups and downs, but rebounded by June. Yet, the unexpected BREXIT vote shook the MSCI EAFE and MSCI EAFE Small Cap indices emphasizing a flight to safety. Gold benefited from the flight as demand increased and the US dollar slightly upped the Euro. 

• Third Quarter: Domestic equities continued their success into the third quarter. Driven by the rising prices of crude oil, energy was up. Concurrently, high yield bonds also continued to recover. The price of gold fell, but ended the quarter positive overall. Internationals had positive returns. A weaker US dollar supported international fixed income returns. 

• Fourth Quarter:  The beginning of the fourth quarter was rough all around, but US equities rebounded by November. Election results helped US equity index funds see their largest monthly inflows in two years. Anticipated policy changes brought gains to commodities and financials, but hurt interest rate sensitive stocks. International investments for US investors were negatively impacted by a strengthened dollar.

Asset Flows: What Investors Did in 2016

Source: Morningstar Direct 2016

After an equity selloff in January 2016, investors flocked to fixed income most of the year. In a year of sluggish growth for the US, Europe, and Japan, bonds provided hope for those seeking modest but relatively predictable returns. As the inflow/outflows graph shows, taxable and municipal bond fund flows dominated without waiver. Apart from commodities (gold) and sector equity, all other categories were out of favor for most of the year. A post-election U-turn helped November bring in inflows for U.S. equity index funds, but it remains that the 2016 investor theme was seeking predictability (through bonds) in an unpredictable environment (populism, political uncertainty, and looming fiscal and monetary policies concerns).

Lessons Moving Forward

• Fear of the unknown can’t guide our investment decisions.  It is understandable to seek refuge when things are uncertain, but we may miss out on opportunities hiding under our shells. Buying bonds in 2016 may have helped limit negative exposure to curveball events, but if you used some of your portfolio’s equity budget to purchase them, you also missed the US equity run that persisted throughout the year. Similarly, portfolios placed on the sidelines after the US elections missed the equity surge that began shortly after. People who remained invested in equities in 2016 felt the hit of BREXIT as well as its fast recovery. They also experienced value stock comebacks. A diversified portfolio can help you maintain market participation and mitigate bumps in the road (market volatility) over time.

• 2016 reminded us that the world is unpredictable. No matter how smart, how informed, how technological, or well-researched - nobody can predict the future. In other words, we can’t allow predictions about the markets or economy change our long term, comprehensive investment plan. Admittedly, it is important to pay attention to what is happening in the world. Our gaze, however, should be focused on the long-term implications of that news. Multiple portfolio changes based on short-term noise undermines our investment strategy. We need to give ourselves the time to really understand and unravel the true long term risks/threats to our portfolio before modifying our strategy. 

Jaclyn Jackson is a Portfolio Administrator and Financial Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.®

---

This information does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material, it has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Opinions expressed are those of Jaclyn Jackson and are not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Investing involves risk, investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy or strategies employed. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Investing in oil involves special risks, including the potential adverse effects of state and federal regulation and may not be suitable for all investors. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Gold is subject to the special risks associated with investing in precious metals, including but not limited to: price being be subject to wide fluctuation; the market being relatively limited; the sources being concentrated in countries that have the potential for instability; and the market being unregulated. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 21 developed nations. The MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index is an equity index which captures small cap representation across Developed Markets countries around the world, excluding the US and Canada. Please note that direct investment in an index is not possible. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Fourth Quarter Investment Pulse

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

Some great research this quarter!  From a headline grabber, to sage words of wisdom from long tenured investors, take a look!

Kevin O’Leary from Shark Tank – 11/18/16 CFA® Society of Michigan

The investment department had the opportunity to listen to “Mr. Wonderful” himself discuss what he has learned being an entrepreneur and his outlook for 2017.  Highlights included that he prefers to invest in companies run by women because they set and accomplish achievable goals for themselves and their employees.  He also discussed his plan for the future generations of O’Learys.  He is not interested in handing his children a privileged life on a platter.  Rather he will pay for them from birth through college and then they are on their own to make their way in life.  The same will happen for their children and so on.  He said his mother taught him this important lesson:

“The only birds that dies leaving the nest are the ones that don't learn how to fly.”

Kevin's predictions for 2017 included:

1. Donald Trump wins the election (he called this a week before the election on television)

2. Oil will end 2017 under $50

3. The 10 year US Treasury bond interest rate will end the year under 3%

4. The S&P 500 will end 2017 at 2,300

5. Financials will underperform the S&P 500 in 2017

6. Real Estate Investment Trusts will outperform the S&P 500 in 2017

7. Energy will underperform the S&P500 in 2017

8. Russell 2000 will outperform the S&P 500 in 2017

9. Europe (currency unhedged) will surprise in 2017 and outperform US markets

Investment team gathers before the presentation: From left to right: Jaclyn Jackson, Portfolio Administrator and Financial Associate, Lauren Adams CFA®, Director of Client Services, Melissa Joy CFP®, Partner; Angela Palacios CFP®, Director of Investments; Nicholas Boguth, Investment Research Associate

David Fisher of American Funds

It was a pleasure learning from David Fisher, equity portfolio manager at Capital Group, and his 50 years of investment experience.  David spent time discussing the culture of their firm and how important it has been over the years to attract and retain high quality investment professionals.  Analysts are compensated on how they perform relative to a benchmark rather than relative to each other.  They feel this has contributed strongly to their years of serving clients well.  David spent his career researching media, consumer electronic and electrical equipment companies.   He discussed how vastly those markets have changed over the years.  He said:

“If you don’t obsolete yourself, someone else will obsolete you.”

He was referring to Eastman Kodak.  Remember those cameras?  The type where you would have to take your film in to develop?  The company held the patent to digital technology and didn’t develop it because it would have put their profitable film and camera areas out of business!  Oops!

Scott Davis, Portfolio Manager of Columbia Dividend Income Fund

We have sat down many times with Scott.  He brings great perspective to our portfolios with his dividend growth focused strategy.  Many investors have chased dividend yields over the past few years when they found their bond portfolios lacking.  Scott argues that the quality of the dividend rather than the yield is most important.  Dividends are not contractually committed to like bond interest.  It is completely up to a Board of Directors whether the dividend is paid or not.  A high yield is only positive if it is sustainable.  A stock price generally depreciates very strongly before a dividend cut occurs, which is why the work Scott does is so important. 

He also discusses with corporate management the type of shareholders that they want to have.  A company’s shareholder base changes when they commit to paying/growing a dividend.  When doing this they have a more stable investor base that tends to hold a position longer term.

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Holding investments for the long term does not insure a profitable outcome. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represent approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in oil involves special risks, including the potential adverse effects of state and federal regulation and may not be suitable for all investors. Investing in the energy sector involves special risks, including the potential adverse effects of state and federal regulation and may not be suitable for all investors. Dividends are not guaranteed and must be authorized by the company's board of directors. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse the opinions or services of Kevin O'Leary, David Fisher, Capital Group, Scott Davis and/or Columbia Dividend Income Fund.

China's Currency - Revisited

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth

I want to revisit a topic I first discussed back in March – China’s currency.

In the previous blog, I explained why China was devaluing their currency and what potential effects it could have on their economy. As previously stated, one of the biggest risks with currency devaluing is the risk of capital outflow. If investors think that there are better opportunities elsewhere, they will move themselves or their money into a country with stronger currency prospects. In the chart below, we can see this exact event currently happening in China.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/china/capital-flows

This is a topic that catches a lot of headlines, and it should be useful to have some background to filter through all the noise. We are likely to see headlines about how China is managing its currency well into the New Year; maybe headlines about Chinese goods getting cheaper as the US Dollar strengthens relative to the yuan, or you may have already seen the most recent headline about China placing restrictions to attempt to slow the capital outflow from the country. They want to slow this mass capital outflow because it is increasing their supply of yuan and triggering inflation that can be harmful in excess. We will stay tuned and observe how the country acts and reacts going forward. If you have any questions about these changes, don’t hesitate to reach out to the Investment Department here at The Center!

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Boguth and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Past performance may not be indicative of future results.

Restricted Stock Units vs Employee Stock Options

Contributed by: Kali Hassinger, CFP®

Some of you may be familiar with the blanket term "stock options." In the past, this term was most likely referring to Employee Stock Options (or ESOs). ESOs were frequently offered as an employee benefit and form of compensation, but, over time, employers have adapted stock options to better benefit both the employee and themselves.

ESOs provided the employee the right to buy a certain number of company shares at a predetermined price for a specific period of time. These options, however, would lose their value if the stock price dropped below the predetermined price, thus becoming essentially worthless to the employee. As an alternative to this format, a large number of employers are now utilizing another type of stock option known as Restricted Stock Units (or RSUs). This option is referred to as a "full value stock grant" because, unlike ESOs, RSUs are worth the "full value" of the stock shares when the grant vests. This means that the RSU will always have value to the employee upon vesting (assuming the stock price doesn't reach $0). In this sense, the RSU is more advantageous to the employee than the ESO.

As opposed to some other types of stock options, the employer is not transferring stock ownership or allocating any outstanding stock to the employee until the predetermined RSU vesting date. The shares granted with RSUs are essentially a promise between the employer and employee, but no shares are received by the employee until vesting. Since there is no "constructive receipt" (IRS term!) of the shares, there is also no taxation until vesting.

For example, if an employer grants 5,000 shares of company stock to an employee as an RSU, the employee won't be sure of how much the grant is worth until vesting. If this stock is valued at $25 upon vesting, the employee would have $125,000 of compensation income (reported on the W-2) that year.

As you can imagine, vesting can cause a large jump in taxable income for the year, so the employee may have to select how to withhold for taxes. Some usual options include paying cash, selling or holding back shares within the grant to cover taxes, or selling all shares and withholding cash from the proceeds. In some RSU plan structures, the employee is allowed to defer receipt of the shares after vesting in order to avoid income taxes during high earning years. In most cases, however, the employee will still have to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes the year the grant vests.

Although there are a few differences between the old school stock option and the newer Restricted Stock Unit hybrid, these options can provide the same incentive for employees. If you have any questions about your own stock options, please reach out to us!

Kali Hassinger, CFP® is an Associate Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.®

---

The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Kali Hassinger, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. This is a hypothetical example for illustration purpose only and does not represent an actual investment.

Market Sector Impact of Donald Trump's Presidential Win

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson

By appealing to white, blue collar voters, Donald Trump unexpectedly captured rustbelt states and secured the 2016 presidential election. Additionally, Republicans made a clean sweep taking both the House and Senate majority. Uncertainty remains as many await cabinet selections and the unveiling of comprehensive policy. Market industry professionals anticipate rising performance from equity sectors that benefit from tax reform, infrastructure stimulus, and deregulation. The “Post-Election Day Winners and Losers” chart gives us insight as to how market sectors have performed post-election. Below, I’ve explored how each sector could continue to win or lose under the Trump administration.

The Winners

Industrials/Materials: Throughout the campaign trail, Trump showed great enthusiasm for infrastructure spending. Accordingly, industrials picked up after the election. Civil infrastructure companies and military contractors will likely have more opportunity for government work under his administration. As a result, the material and industrial sectors should have legs to run. 

Energy: Companies linked to fossil fuel energy may see a lift under a Republican White House because of less regulation and slower adaptation to renewable energy. Trump’s support of coal energy positions the energy sector for rebound.

Healthcare: Assuredly, the Affordable Care Act is on the agenda for repeal under the Trump administration. Companies that have benefited from Obamacare may decline. In contrast, pharmaceutical and biotech stocks have rallied due to the President-elect’s relatively lenient stance on drug pricing. Yet, there are no sure signs this sector will remain a winner since Trump also favored prescription drugs importation (unconventional for GOP policy) during his campaign run. According to Morgan Stanley analysis, prescription drug importation could negatively impact pharmaceutical companies.

Financials: Banks have rallied as Trump’s victory points towards deregulating financials. Conversely, well-known investment management corporation, BlackRock, challenged that repealing the Dodd-Frank law may result in “simpler and blunter, but equally onerous rules.”

The Losers

Treasuries: As votes tallied in favor of Trump’s victory on election night, investors fled from equities to Treasuries. The risk-off approach, however, dissipated overnight; perhaps because Trump’s victory speech was more conciliatory than expected revealing hope for moderate governance. Ultimately, U.S. Treasury concerns hinge on whether Trump’s policies widen the deficit.

Emerging Markets: Mexico’s reliance on exports to the US leave it vulnerable to tariffs/trade wars, therefore, Mexico and countries alike (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia) could sell off. We’ve already witnessed the peso falling in response to Trump’s protectionist views. On the other hand, JPMorgan’s chief global strategist, Dr. David Kelly, encouraged investors to evaluate emerging markets by their own “strengths.” China and some countries in Latin America, for example, are adjusting well to growth and lack populous sentiment. Overall, emerging markets have forward momentum with improving economies, easing monetary policies, and a global focus on spending.

Developed Markets/Euro: Companies with money overseas in the technology, healthcare, industrials, and consumer discretionary sectors, could gain from Trump’s desire to incentivize business repatriation of offshore cash. Subsequently, the Euro has fallen provided high concentrations of US based multinationals’ earnings are in Europe.

Consumer Stocks: Consumer stocks could be hurt because tougher immigration restrictions may deter labor supply and consumer demand. Additionally, policies that force tariffs on countries like China and Mexico may unintentionally pass on the costs of tariffs to US consumers.

If you have questions about your portfolio or how these “winners and losers” might affect you and your future, please reach out to your planner. We’re always here to help and answer your questions!

Jaclyn Jackson is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Jaclyn Jackson and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Sector investments are companies engaged in business related to a specific sector. They are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence. There are additional risks associated with investing in an individual sector, including limited diversification. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss. Past performance may not be indicative of future results.

Third Quarter Investment Commentary

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

After a very interesting first half of the year with early negative returns, followed by Brexit in June, markets performed well in July and then quieted down in the month of August. September brought with it a bit of increased fluctuation when investors thought the Federal Reserve Board may raise rates at the September meeting but calmed back down when that fear subsided. As of October 1st the S&P 500 gained over 7.8% this year including dividends with nearly half of that gain (3.85%) coming in the third quarter. The year-to-date story, however, has not been told primarily by the S&P 500 as we have gotten so used to over the past several years. 

Diversification Works Again

This year other asset classes have had the opportunity to shine as Emerging markets; commodities and high yield have topped S&P 500 returns. Diversification seems to once again be working after a long drought. The chart below shows performance of various asset classes by year with the best performer’s bars on the top of the stack and worst relative performers on the bottom. Notice the Green line (S&P 500) has been near the top of the list for the past three years but that hasn’t been the norm over the last 14 years. This year we have returned to the more normal pattern where the S&P doesn’t dominate.

Source: Blackrock

Rate Hike Kicked Down the Road

Not surprisingly the Federal Reserve opted not to raise interest rates last month. The dissention among the voting members, though, was surprising. Three members of the voting board voted for an interest rate increase going against Janet Yellen’s recommendations to hold course. This is the first noted dissention since 2014. The next meeting occurs in November just a few short days before the election. It is highly unlikely they will make waves that close to the election so it looks likely that if a rate increase occurs it will be at the December 13-14th meeting.

Election

I would be avoiding the elephant in the room if I didn’t mention the election. Jaclyn Jackson wrote a piece on political parties and their impact to your portfolio, I would encourage you to read this before making any rash investment decisions based on the election. The battle between Clinton and Trump is proving to fulfill every media fantasy. They both certainly make for excellent headlines. Trump will be doing his best to rally voters to change by making promises but also by making things seem worse in the economy than they likely are. While there is often some volatility leading into an election because of these negative headlines, usually after the decision has been made markets settle down and most often continue in a positive direction the remainder of the year.

Checkout Investment Pulse, by Angela Palacios, CFP®, a special summary of the Morningstar ETF conference she attended.

Harvesting tax loss may sound counter-intuitive but can go a long way to enhance net after-tax returns for investors. Find out some strategies to implement and common mistakes to avoid.

This month Nick Boguth, Investment Research Associate, gives us an introduction to cost basis methods and what we typically have our clients utilize.

Jaclyn Jackson, Investment Research Associate, explains to us how just like the right mix of ingredients for a tasty meal, we also need to know the asset allocation mix that makes our investment journey palatable.

If you have topics you would like us to cover in the future, please let us know! As always, we appreciate the opportunity to meet your financial planning and investment needs. Thank you!

Angela Palacios, CFP®
Director of Investments
Financial Advisor

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss. Investing always involves risk, including the loss of principal, and futures trading could present additional risk based on underlying commodities investments. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investor Basics: Cost Basis Accounting

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth

Cost basis: one of the many things we at The Center monitor in order to serve our clients. Most of us know that cost basis is the original value of a security (usually the purchase price), but a lesser known fact is that there are many different accounting methods used to calculate tax liability when the decision is made to sell a security. The table below describes the different methods available.

This is important because the incorrect accounting method could lead to an unnecessary or unexpected amount of capital gains. Hypothetical example: you bought 50 shares of Tesla back in 2012 when it was $30, and another 50 shares in 2014 when it was $200. Now it is 10/5/16, and you went to sell 50 shares at its current price of $210. How much of your sale would be considered capital gains? Well, if your accounting method was FIFO, the answer would be $180 per share, whereas if your accounting method was minimum tax (The Center’s default option) then it would be $10 per share.

The outcomes between accounting methods can be drastically different, and each method has its place depending on your objective. Decision-making from client to client may vary which is where the help of a financial professional can come into play. Please read our Director of Investments, Angela Palacios’, CFP®, Investor Ph.D. blog for insight into more strategies that The Center practices in order to help minimize tax burden.

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Boguth and not necessarily those of Raymond James. This is a hypothetical example for illustration purpose only and does not represent an actual investment. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Every investor's situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon before making any investment. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

Investor PhD: Harvesting Losses and Avoiding Gains

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

This may sound counter-intuitive, but taking some measures to harvest tax losses on positions and avoiding unnecessary capital gains distributions this time of year can go a long way in improving your net (after tax) returns.

Make sure you are reviewing your portfolio throughout the year for tax losses to harvest.  Stock losses were at their peak during mid-February, but if you waited until this fall to think about tax loss harvesting you have most likely missed the boat as much of those losses have been recovered and moved on to higher highs. The end of the year is rarely the best time of the year to harvest tax losses. 

Harvesting losses doesn’t mean you are giving up on the position entirely. When you sell to harvest a loss you cannot have had a purchase into that security within the 30 days prior to and after the sale.  If you do you are violating the wash sale rule and the loss is disallowed by the IRS. Despite these restrictions, there are several ways you can carry out a successful loss harvesting strategy.

Loss harvesting strategies:

• Sell the position and hold cash for 30 days before re-purchasing the position. The downside here is that you are out of the investment and give up potential returns (or losses) during the 30 day window.

• Sell and immediately buy a position that is similar to maintain market exposure rather than sitting in cash for those 30 days. After the 30 day window is up you can sell the temporary holding and re-purchase that original investment.

• Purchase the position more than 30 days before you want to try to harvest a loss. Then after the 30 day time window is up you can sell the originally owned block of shares at the loss. Being able to specifically identify a tax lot of the security to sell will open this option up to you.

Common mistakes some people make when harvesting:

• Dividend reinvests count!!! So if you think you may employ this strategy and the position pays and reinvests a monthly dividend you may want to consider having that dividend pay to cash and just reinvest it yourself when appropriate or you will violate the wash sale rule.

• Purchasing a similar position and that position pays out a capital gain during the short time you own it.

• Creating a gain when selling the fund you moved to temporarily that wipes out any loss you harvest. Make the loss you harvest meaningful or be comfortable holding the temporary position longer.

• Buying the position in your IRA. This will violate the wash sale rule just like if you bought it in your taxable account. This is identified by social security numbers on your tax filing. So any accounts held under those same tax payer IDs are not allowed to purchase the security in that 30 day window of harvesting the losses.

Personal circumstances vary widely so it is critical to work with your tax professional and financial advisor to discuss more complicated strategies like this!

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.