Investment Perspectives

, ,

Investment Commentary: 3Q 2017

, ,
20171013.jpg

This summer came and went with no shortage of topics for investors to worry about.  Low inflation, natural disasters, and geopolitical tension kept the headlines busy.  Despite all of this, the quarter ended on a positive note.  The uptick in markets was spurred on by a wide-spread pick up in global growth.  Recession risks continue to remain muted as dovish global central banks continue to inject liquidity in the system, or only very slowly begin to pull back on the injections.  In general, economic data remains strong.   We remain watchful for a slowing, particularly in manufacturing, business and consumer confidence, as these are early indicators of the tide of the economy turning. However, they are still positive.

Diversification is coming back into style as international and emerging markets continue to perform stronger than their domestic counterparts this year.  The S&P 500 Index ended the quarter returning 14.24% through the 30th of September.  International markets are truly the bright spot with the MSCI EAFE returning 19.96% and the MSCI EM Index returning 27.78%.  Bonds ended the third quarter with a respectful 3.14% return coming from the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index.

Rates remain unchanged

In September, the Federal Reserve (Fed) kept rates unchanged, but also announced additional information on how it will begin to unwind the $4.5 trillion balance sheet in October. 

The Committee intends to gradually reduce the Federal Reserve's holdings of treasury securities and agency securities--agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS)--by decreasing the reinvestment of the principal payments it receives from securities holdings. Each month, such payments will be reinvested only to the extent that they exceed a pre-specified cap. The caps will rise gradually at three-month intervals over a 12-month period and the maximum value of the caps at the end of the 12-month period will be maintained until the size of the balance sheet is normalized. (https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/policy-normalization-qa.htm)

This plan to shrink the balance sheet seems to reflect the Fed’s positive view of the U.S. economy.

blog3.png

Proposed tax changes being debated

Political stakes are high for President Trump to score a legislative win on what remains of his campaign promises.  In late September, he unveiled a proposal to slash taxes for individuals and businesses.  To simplify the tax code, Republicans have proposed condensing from seven tax brackets down to three (12%, 25% and 35%), doubling the standard deduction to help tax payers eliminate the need to itemize, and “significantly increasing” the child tax credit while also adding a new tax credit for the care of non-child dependents (elder-care situations).

Currently, many taxpayers use itemized deductions, claiming write-offs for things like charitable contributions, interest paid on a mortgage, state and local taxes. If the standard deduction becomes larger, fewer taxpayers will need to itemize, reducing the incentive to hold a mortgage or contribute to charity.

President Trump is also proposing to cut the corporate tax rate from 35% down to 20%.  A new tax rate would be established for pass-through entities which represent about 95% of businesses in the United States.  Generally when corporate tax rates are cut, markets perform very well in the year following the tax cut. The chart below demonstrates that after the rate cut for corporate taxes (Orange area below the line), the following 1 year returns on the S&P500 are quite positive (blue bar above the line).

Michigan 529 plan changes

In September, the Michigan 529 Advisor Plan, transitioned its program from Allianz Global Investors to Nuveen Securities, LLC.  Account numbers stayed the same and investments mapped over to similar strategies; if you had one of these accounts, the transition was seamless.  Some of the benefits of the change include an expanded investment line-up, more leading edge investment managers and lower fees.  If you have any questions don’t hesitate to reach out!

After several years of equity volatility near historic lows, this quarter we again experienced the speed and scale at which geopolitics can possibly move markets. We remain committed to the view that managing volatility is at the heart of proper portfolio design.  It is a responsibility we take very seriously and we thank you for the continued trust you place in us to help you with these decisions!

On behalf of everyone here at The Center,

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF®
Director of Investments
Financial Advisor

invcom_pulse_400x200-2.jpg

Investment Pulse: Check out Investment Pulse, by Nick Boguth, a summary of investment-focused meetings for the quarter.

invcom_phd_400x200.jpg
invcom_basics_400x200.jpg

Investor Basics Series: Nick Boguth, Investment Research Associate, talks about exchange rates.

invcom_ofnote_400x200.jpg

Of Financial Note:  Jaclyn Jackson, Portfolio Coordinator, shares a look at the asset flow for 3rd quarter.

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

This information does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material; it has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making and investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk; investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy or strategies employed. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Asset allocation and diversification do not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 21 developed nations. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index is an unmanaged market value weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset backed, mortgage backed securities with a maturity of at least 1 year. Please note direct investment in any index is not possible. Index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary.

, ,

Investor Ph.D: How Currency Movement Effect International Investments

, ,
20171012.jpg

Investors with the patience to hold on to their diversified portfolio that maintains a component of international have likely been rewarded this year.  Before this year, investors challenged the advice of diversifying their portfolio away from the U.S. as international investments, represented by the MSCI EAFE, noticeably lagged U.S. returns in recent years.  The chart below shows how the MSCI EAFE has performed vs. the S&P 500.  When the gray shaded area is above 0, this represents a time when the prior three years of returns have been dominated by the MSCI EAFE outperforming the S&P 500.  When you drill down into specific extended time periods when this happens, you can see that much of the returns come from the impact of the currency return (the lighter green portion of the return).  You see in recent years the S&P 500 has significantly outperformed international investments. 

A weakness in the U.S. dollar has contributed to the outperformance year-to-date by the MSCI EAFE (as of 9/30/2017 the MSCI EAFE was up XX% vs. the S&P 500 was up XX%).  When the dollar is in a cycle of weakening against foreign currencies, there is a natural tailwind helping performance.  Coupled with the global economy strengthening and political risks receding due to a failed populist movement in Europe, this could be a continuing recipe for international investing tailwinds.

Take a look at the impact on stock markets around the globe during these periods of different U.S. dollar trends:

When the U.S. dollar index is retreating, Foreign and Emerging markets have outperformed and vice versa.  If the U.S. dollar continues its current trend of weakening or even levels out, we could continue to see the performance story dominated by foreign investments.

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

This information has been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Opinions expressed are those of Angela Palacios and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. There is no assurance the trends mentioned will continue or the forecasts provided will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk, investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy or strategies employed. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 21 developed nations. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. Please note direct investment in an index is not possible. Index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

, ,

Investor Basics: Exchange Rates

, ,

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth Nicholas Boguth

20171011.jpg

An exchange rate is just the price of one currency in terms of a different currency. For example, as I wrote this blog on 9/29/17, the USD/EUR exchange rate was .85. This means that 1 US Dollar would buy 0.85 Euro.

Exchange rates fluctuate though, and this is where things get complicated for investors. Inflation, interest rates, asset flows, trade, and economic stability are all factors that move exchange rates. Below is a chart showing just how much the exchange rate between the US Dollar and the Euro has fluctuated in the past 10 years.

blog 2.png

Now these exchange rates may not directly affect you in your day to day purchases, but if you are invested internationally, exchange rates affect your portfolio. Head on over to our Director of Investments Angela Palacios’s blog (coming on Thursday!) to read about exactly how exchange rates have affected returns recently.

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

, ,

Financial Note: Asset Flow Watch 2017 3Q

, ,

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson Jaclyn Jackson

20171010.jpg

One of the most common ways to monitor consumer confidence and investor sentiment is to watch fund inflows and outflows.  Market analysts use fund flows to measure sentiment within asset classes, sectors, or markets. This information (combined with other economic indicators) help identify trends and determine investment opportunities.

July trends picked up where June left off, as international equities and taxable bonds continued to receive inflows. 

Most of these flows came through passive funds, but active flows were still positive.  Conversely, US equities saw outflows as valuations appear to be fair or high (depending on whom you ask) and administration confidence declines.  Accordingly, The International Monetary Fund decreased their US GDP growth forecast from 2.3% to 2.1%.  In terms of internationals, investors are opting for developed markets through foreign large blend funds.  Ultimately, this is a play for Europe.  The International Monetary Fund increased its expected growth rate from 1.7% to 1.9% in Europe.   Investors also sought out emerging market funds as the MSCI Emerging Markets index has double-digit returns year to date (28.3% returns YTD at the end of August).

In August, international equity inflows were positive but less positive than in July. 

The slowdown reflects lackluster corporate earnings internationally and uncertainty about North Korea.  Nonetheless, internationals remain compelling to investors with rebounds from Japan and Europe progressing.  MSCI EAFE returns have remained ahead of the S&P 500 in 2017.  Taxable bonds, specifically intermediate-term bond funds, remained the leading category group for inflows. Intermediate bond funds hit the “sweet spot” for many investors because they are usually not as severely impacted by rising rates as long term bonds and typically generate more return than short term bonds.  From January 1st through August 15th, intermediate bonds gained 3.2% beating both the Bloomberg Barclays US Bond Index and 2016 returns.  Differing from June and July, investors are trending back towards active management for their bond funds.

blog1.jpg

As of writing this, October 4th, 2017, September flows mimic July and August with outflows from US equities and continued inflows to international equities and taxable bonds. 

There are also positive inflows for municipal bonds and alternatives.  Outflows from the US are mostly from growth (especially large growth) and US large blend funds.  International equities experienced outflows last week, but are net positive for the month.  Bond inflows are steady with investors largely continuing to invest in intermediate term bond funds as wells as modestly investing in high yield municipals funds and national intermediate municipal bonds.

Bonds Lead the Pack

Even as rates rise, investors continue to pour assets into bond funds. Why is that the case? Income and diversification seem to motivate the trend.  Even if interest rates rise and bond prices go down, investors still want the guaranteed income stream bonds provide.  Some may also feel they can pick up higher payouts from new bond issues as interest rates increase.  In terms of diversifications, investors have seen gains from their US equities and feel like it is time to rebalance into a true stock diversifier; bonds.

Jaclyn Jackson is a Portfolio Administrator and Financial Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.®

This information does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material; it has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Jaclyn Jackson and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making and investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk, investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy or strategies employed. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Asset allocation and diversification do not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 21 developed nations. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index is an unmanaged market value weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset backed, mortgage backed securities with a maturity of at least 1 year. Please note direct investment in any index is not possible.

, ,

Investment Pulse: 3Q 2017

, ,

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth Nicholas Boguth

20171009.jpg

We’ve been busy here in the Investment Department! Check out some of our research highlights from the third quarter.

Angela Palacios, Director of Investments at The Center, attends Capital Group Advisor Forum

Angela traveled to Capital Group’s headquarters in California, to look under the hood at their investment strategies focusing on their process, people and investment outlooks.  You may know the strategies as the American Funds family. The discussion spanned from macro-economics to fixed income and equity discussions. On the macroeconomic front they discussed their recession outlook. Anne Vandenabeele, Economist, stated that expansions don’t die of old age, they die because imbalances build up in the economy or the Federal Reserve raises rates too quickly. They don’t see either of these scenarios right now. Most severe bear markets are when you have a bear market combined with a recession. While there may be a bear market in the next several years they don’t see a recession occurring at the same time. 

Clayton Shiver, Portfolio Manager at Stadion Money Management

Part of our investment process is to stay on top of investment products being offered in the marketplace. Nick Boguth met with Clayton Shiver to discuss Stadion’s alternative product platform and understand the team’s investment process. Clayton discussed their three sleeve alternative approach that included an equity, income, and trend sleeve implemented with the buying and selling of stocks and options in order to generate very different potential returns from the S&P 500 or Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index.

Matt Lamphier, Portfolio Manager at First Eagle

Matt Lamphier, director of research for the Global Value team at First Eagle Investment Management, joined us at our office for a jam-packed hour of investment updates. We discussed First Eagle’s investment process, outlook, and rationale behind their investments. Matt stressed the importance of being a value investor, and choosing companies that will outperform over the long term. One surprising statistic that Matt shared was that the average timespan of a stock in their portfolio is over 10 years!

What to expect next time…

We have a busy schedule next quarter and are looking forward to sharing highlights from our upcoming conferences including: Thornburg Investment Management, First Eagle, and Investment News.

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Boguth and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Raymond James is not affiliated with Anne Vandenabeele, Clayton Shiver, Stadion Money Management, Matt Lampier and/or First Eagle Investment Management.

,

Irma’s Devastating Winds Don’t Devastate The Market

,

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth Nicholas Boguth

20170926.jpg

Hurricane Irma, one of the strongest and longest-lasting hurricanes ever recorded, recently passed leaving a long path of destruction behind it. People from the Caribbean to Florida prepared for the beast of a storm prior to labor day weekend, but there is only so much that could be done before its 180+ mph winds tore through the Virgin Islands on Wednesday the 6th, Cuba on Friday, and finally Florida and Georgia by Sunday. Entire islands were left in shambles across the Caribbean, Florida and Georgia sustained major damage, and millions of people are left without power and water.

How did the market respond?

We are constantly reminded that the markets do not like uncertainty, and this rings true when you look at short periods of volatility, but look at all of the uncertainty that we’ve seen in the past 15 years. Since ’02, we’ve had 3 presidents from republican, to democrat, back to republican, Congress party control flipped multiple times, we’ve seen 2 major wars, devastating natural disasters, massive oil spills, major business and even city bankruptcies, and a “Great Recession”. What did the S&P 500 do over the past 15 years? It is up about ~9% annualized, which is right on par with the average return of the S&P over the past 100 years.

Reminder: be a long term investor. Do not try to time the market, and if you ever have any questions – we are here to help!

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Boguth and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

, ,

4 steps to our Due Diligence Process

, ,
20170912.jpg

My friend’s wife is constantly putting him on a diet. He often appeases her by ordering taco salads instead of a traditional entree.  She assumes he’s eating healthy, but little does she know: some taco salads can pack as many as 1,700 calories and over 100 grams of fat! His wife might need to do her homework.

As important as it is to the success of dieting to understand what you are eating, it is equally important to understand what you are buying when investing.  Once you have identified your appropriate mix of asset classes for your risk tolerance and time horizon (your strategic allocation), it is time to start doing your homework to identify the appropriate securities to fill each asset bucket. 

Here is a summary of the steps we follow at The Center:

  • Qualitative Review: We generate ideas through reading, conference attendance, peer networking and searches in Morningstar Direct.  The following criteria serve as a starting point.

    • At least $50 Million of Assets Under Management (AUM)

    • Manager tenure of 10 years or more

    • Bottom half of expense ratio in category

    • Manager invests in their strategy ($1 Million and up preferred)

  • Quantitative Review: We review the performance and risk characteristics of investment options within the category.  Criteria may include but are not limited to:

    • Review of rolling returns to identify performance standouts over different time periods – 1, 3, 5, and 10 years.

    • Review of performance during difficult time periods (bear markets or periods of performance difficulty for the asset category).

    • Review of rolling statistics including standard deviation, alpha, beta, Sharpe and information ratio relative to best-fit benchmarks.

    • Review of upside-downside capture.

    • Review asset flows by category and individual security.

  • Due Diligence Questionnaire & Manager Interview:  Center for Financial Planning’s Due Diligence Questionnaire is submitted to the short list candidates for completion.  Manager interviews for active strategies are conducted via phone conference or in-person interview. 

  • Mock-up in portfolios: Position is added into a mockup of the portfolio to identify if intended outcome is achieved and what degree of exposure is required to help attain the desired outcome (percent allocated within the portfolio).

You can also view a simplified graphic on this process:

20170912a.jpg

You can do your investment “waistline” a favor by doing your homework. Don’t be fooled by taco salads, make sure you are getting what you want when it comes to investing by having a defined buying process, or talking to your financial planner about establishing one that is appropriate for you!

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

, ,

ESG Investing: The Little Engine That Could

, ,

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson Jaclyn Jackson

20170822.jpg

As children, many of us were made familiar with The Little Engine That Could, a story about a small railroad engine that overcame the seemingly impossible challenge of pulling heavy freight cars up and over an intimidating mountain. As we witness the unraveling of many government policies, alliances, and programs helpful to ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) investing such as dismantling carbon dioxide mitigation, leaving the Paris Agreement global pact, looming EPA budget cuts, etc., it would appear that an insurmountable amount of challenges could hurt ESG investment product performance.

Yet, like The Little Engine, the trend towards ESG investing is plugging ahead with great intensity. In fact, the recent focus on these issues has fired up investors and fund companies.  Leading research firm, Morningstar, has seen a four-fold increase in the use of ESG data in its cloud-based research platform used by asset managers, advisory firms and independent wealth managers since Trump’s election.  Net flows into ESG products in the first 6 months of 2017 have been greater than both 2014 and 2015.  With a dozen new open-end sustainable mutual funds, 2017 flows are also positioned to beat 2016 numbers.

Performance

Excluding ethical motivations, ESG transparency helps investors get a unique, “under the hood” analysis of company risk (or stability) that complements traditional research methods. For example, ESG risks are sometimes more prominent in foreign markets (autocratic governments, human rights issues, wage disparities, etc.).  The graph below demonstrates that ignoring ESG factors may lead to reduced returns for investors in emerging markets.

Capture.PNG8.22.17.PNG

A study done by European Centre for Corporate Engagement (ECCE) also supports correlation between good ESG practices and financial performance for emerging-market companies.  Even in the case of developed markets, Hermes' global equities team research found that avoiding companies with bottom-decile corporate governance rankings could increase returns by 30 basis points (bps) per month.  To boot, research by index provider, MSCI, indicated that a company’s efforts towards sustainability, such as fair labor practices, good environmental stewardship, and diverse internal leadership, improves returns.

Is it Just Smart Business?

Going back to our metaphor, imagine that the Little Engine was little by design.  While the Little Engine had fewer cylinders and less horse power, it also burned less fuel.  Since the Little Engine was smaller, it weighed less and minimized wear and tear on the parts that supported it. Perhaps the company that owned or built the Little Engine designed it to save money on fuel, have fewer repairs, and prevent EPA emission fines from cutting into profits. 

This begs the question, Are companies that manage environmental, social, and governance factors just practicing smart business strategy?  Phil Davidson, co-manager of American Century Equity Income, stated it best in a Barron’s article, “Cutting corners on environmental issues, for instance, can lead to lawsuits, fines, and damages. Businesses that use less water and less power have lower costs and operate more efficiently. Good corporate governance plays a winning hand in capital allocation and is critical to corporate longevity. If a company is being managed for the short term to maximize revenue, that’s not sustainable.” 

Here to Stay

Despite political noise, it seems some fund companies and investors alike continue to embrace ESG strategies.  Research indicates monitoring risks factors that may affect the sustainability of a company may prove to support higher potential returns.  Perhaps ESG strategies are finally “up the hill” as they seem to be a more common part of one’s investment strategy.

Jaclyn Jackson is a Portfolio Administrator and Financial Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.®

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Jaclyn Jackson and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Future investment performance cannot be guaranteed, investment yields will fluctuate with market conditions.

, ,

2nd Quarter Investment Commentary

, ,

You may have noticed 2017 has been an easy year to open your statements. Markets around the world have been trending in a positive direction with only short-lived bouts of risk aversion. As a whole, volatility is extremely low and getting lower by the day it seems. U.S. markets have enjoyed positive returns of 10% for the S&P 500 so far this year as of June 30, 2017. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index has also been up 2.27%.  Overseas has been the big story of the year with the MSCI EAFE returning 14.1% and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index returning about the same. This strong increase has occurred despite headwinds from Brexit negotiations that are beginning and are expected to be challenging as well as concerns over high and quickly growing debt levels in China.

The Federal Reserve has approved one more rate hike this quarter, during June, which was fully anticipated by markets. One more has been telegraphed by the Fed for this year and would likely come late fall/winter if it does at all. This last potential rate hike of 2017 will depend on the strength of economic data over the coming months.

The Economy

Our domestic economy continues to grow slowly but steadily. Wages are growing, although, at a pace slower than historical averages. Inflation has been more subdued than expected, in large part because wage growth has been muted. Unemployment has continued to fall, and it has become harder to fill open job positions. Low unemployment ultimately should result in wages increasing, but, so far, we have not seen an impact here in a meaningful way.  Energy prices increased over a year ago, and rent and housing costs are on the rise. These last two points serve to take away some of our discretionary spending money which is important to bolster Gross Domestic Product growth that has come in below the Fed’s expectations of 2.2% so far this year. 

Brexit – One year later

A little over one year ago, the British voted to exit the European Union on June 23rd, 2016.  As you may recall, this created quite a bit of volatility in the market leading up to and immediately after the decision. The British government stepped in quickly, vowing to support liquidity at banks and emphasized it would be an orderly divorce. This action assuaged fears resulting in the markets here in the U.S. as well as overseas bouncing back to where they had been prior the decision.  So one year later, what has the impact been?

  1. The British pound is about 15% cheaper than where it was last year. While a cheaper pound helps boost the country’s exports, it, unfortunately, serves to increase the price of imports causing inflation within the country. If you were ever going to take a trip to England, now may be a good time as our dollar is much stronger than it has been in recent years!

  2. Business investment in the U.K. has softened dramatically due to the uncertainty surrounding potential future tariffs. The Gross Domestic Product growth has also slowed as a result.

  3. Immigration is falling into the U.K. meaning many jobs are having a hard time finding workers for farming and construction positions.

Affordable Care Act—Repeal?

ObamaCare is facing a threat of repeal in the Senate. The Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, is working to revise the bill to be looked at again in July after it met resistance from some members of the Republican Party. If he can’t create a bill all Republicans can agree on, then they will be forced to seek a more bi-partisan supported bill, further delaying any change. If repealed, volatility would likely increase in the healthcare sector, but the market effects would be very dependent on the terms that pass. This is something we will continue to keep our eyes on.

While it has been a tranquil year thus far, it is important not to let the resilience in stock markets lull you into a false sense of security. It is easy to forget what downside volatility feels like when we haven’t experienced a meaningful pullback in so long. Rebalancing your portfolio and keeping risk in check is important particularly in this stage of a bull market, when it may be tempting to reach for more. Check out our recent Mid-Year Investment Update webinar if you want to hear more information on these topics as well as other headlines this quarter!

On behalf of everyone here at The Center,

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF®

Director of Investments
Financial Advisor  

Investment Pulse: Check out Investment Pulse, by Angela Palacios, CFP®, a summary of investment-focused meetings for the quarter.

Investor Basics Series: Nick Boguth, Investment Research Associate, introduces us to bond options.

Of Financial Note:  Jaclyn Jackson, Portfolio Coordinator, continues her series on behavioral investing here.

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The MSCI EAFE Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 21 developed nations. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indexes. The index’s three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability. Please note that international investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets.

Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-latest-news-business-economic-costs-banks-one-year-vote-anniversary-eu-exit-a7802596.html

, , ,

Investor Ph.D.: Paying a Premium

, , ,

Co-Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®Angela Palacios and DewRina Lee DewRina Lee

We aren’t talking Healthcare or Prada even, though you pay premiums for both. Rather, we are discussing why investors may pay a premium for bonds. Bonds are frequently purchased at prices below or above par; that is, at a discount or a premium. Bonds trade at a discount when the coupon rate is lower than the market interest rate, and they trade at a premium when its coupon rate is higher than the market interest rate.

For the purpose of this blog, we will be focusing mainly on the reasons behind why someone may choose a premium bond.

Take the following scenario:

Intuition seems to indicate that when deciding between a discount bond at a price of $970 and a premium bond at a price of $1,030, an investor should take the discount option. It’s always more fun to buy that Prada purse when it’s on sale right? But, there are times when you may want to pay the higher price, for example, if you want the latest season’s purse rather than last seasons.

But enough about my purse addiction, let’s get back to bonds. If the bond matures at $1,000, a discount bond holder who bought at $970 will be pocketing $30 while a premium bondholder who paid $1,030 will be losing $30, right? Not exactly. The higher price a premium bondholder has paid is made up for by the higher interest payments they will earn along the way. In many cases, the additional cash flow more than pays for the cost of the premium price paid up-front. Take a look at the following example:

Additionally, due to its larger cash flows, the time it takes to repay the initial investment is shortened. With all else equal, the higher the coupon rate, the shorter the duration. As such, premium bonds can be more defensive in a rising interest rate environment and potentially less volatile. Also, this larger cash flow allows investors to reinvest more in new bonds to capture potential rate increase. By no means does this mean that premium bonds are immune to rising rates; however, they may offer a way to capture the higher yields with some degree of downside protection in a declining market.

So why pay a premium? In essence, there are a few advantages of buying premium bonds:

  • Higher coupon rate

  • Shorter duration to pay off your initial investment

  • Less sensitivity to fluctuations in interest rates

  • Opportunity to reinvest at a potentially higher rate.

Of course, there are additional risks and financial objectives that are personalized to each individual. Contact your financial planner to figure out how bonds may fit into your personalized financial plan!

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

DewRina Lee is an intern at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.®

This information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete; it is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed are those of Angela Palacios and DewRina Lee and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. There is an inverse relationship between interest rate movements and bond prices. Generally, when interest rates rise, bond prices fall and when interest rates fall, bond prices generally rise. There are special risks associated with investing with bonds such as interest rate risk, market risk, call risk, prepayment risk, credit risk, reinvestment risk, and unique tax consequences. The example provided is hypothetical and has been included for illustrative purposes only, it does not represent an actual investment.

Live YOUR Plan™