Planning Opportunities for LGBTQ+ Elders

Contributed by: Lauren Adams, CFA®, CFP®

For over 35 years, our independent wealth management firm Center for Financial Planning, Inc. has partnered with Raymond James Financial Services to achieve our mission of “Improving lives through financial planning done right.” In addition to providing our clients with custodial services for their investment accounts, Raymond James also offers a wide range of resources to The Center from everything from equity research reports to educational opportunities to stay on top of the ever-changing financial planning landscape.

One wonderful resource example is the Raymond James Pride Financial Advisors Network, a network of advisors serving the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) community that was founded in 2020, and its “Inaugural Business of Pride Symposium,” held in June 2021. At the Symposium, I had the opportunity to attend a session titled, “The LGBT+ Aging Crisis – Planning Opportunities for our LGBT+ Elders,” presented by Dan Steward, National Program Director for the Human Rights Campaign Aging Project, and Sherrill Wayland, Director of National Education Initiatives for SAGE.

In the presentation, Steward and Wayland discussed practical ways for financial planners to address and better serve members of the LGBTQ+ community:

• Recognize the distinct needs of this growing and diverse community: It is estimated that there are over 2.7 million older adults that self-identify as members of the LGBTQ+ community. Citing the work of leading researcher Professor Karen Fredriksen-Goldsen, the presenters explained that within this group, however, there is a wide range of generational experiences: from the oldest “Invisible Generation” that grew up when public discussion of LGBTQ+ issues was unheard of, to “The Silent Generation” that grew up when issues were being discussed but faced heavy discrimination, to the younger “Pride Generation” where many have been out for decades. Recognizing that there are nuances within the community, but also understanding the overarching themes of discrimination and resiliency, is an important component of developing the cultural competency required to best serve these clients.

• Plan, Plan, Plan: I’ve seen firsthand how the benefits of pairing comprehensive financial planning with a thoughtfully constructed, well-diversified investment portfolio that fits the clients’ needs and objectives can be liberating and even life-changing for so many. Working with a financial planner early on can help members of the community develop good financial health and financial security that will position them well later in life. Thoughtful estate planning (including considering if wills, Durable Powers of Attorney for Healthcare and Financial Matters, and living trusts are right for the situation) become all the more critical given that members of the LGBTQ+ community still face legal discrimination in many areas. Proper insurance planning can help manage risks and protect assets, including the potential need for long-term care coverage, over a client’s lifetime.

• Be aware of the elevated risk of financial exploitation and barriers to seeking help: According to SAGE, a significant portion of the elder LGBTQ+ community does not wish to live alone, has shrinking support networks, and may be inclined to seek companionship online. These factors can conspire to put these clients at higher risk of financial exploitation (including online “sweetheart scams”) and elder abuse. At the same time, coming from a place of resilience and self-sufficiency after facing discrimination throughout their lives, LGBTQ+ elders may be reluctant to seek help. They may fear being outed if they need assistance, that they won’t be believed by authorities, the loss of financial support from the abusive person, or the prospect of living alone. Financial planners – who may be some of the most trusted people in the client’s life – must be aware of these concerns and be ready to help encourage reaching out to authorities or seeking assistance if needed.

• Know your resources: In the effort to assist, planners must know what resources are available and be cognizant of the added layer of being able to identify inclusive service providers. Steward and Wayland identified several resources that financial planners serving this community should be aware of:

  • The Long-Term Care Equality Index – The first national benchmarking system for residential long-term care communities. The index was launched in June 2021 and 184 communities participated. It was created by a partnership between the Human Rights Campaign Foundation and SAGE to promote equitable and inclusive care for LGBTQ+ older adults.

  • National Resource Center on LGBT Aging – This project is funded by the U.S. Administration for Community Living and serves as a resource center to improve the quality of services and support offered to LGBTQ+ older adults. It offers a host of resources ranging from caregiver support to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid guides to resource directories on the national and state level.

  • SAGE – SAGECare provides LGBTQ+ cultural competency training on aging issues to service providers. Their “Find a Provider” tool can be used to locate service providers that have participated in their cultural competency training programs.

 By keeping these considerations and resources in mind, financial professionals can ensure all clients –regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity – can benefit from the power of financial planning and act as true advocates for the aging LGBTQ+ community.

Lauren Adams, CFA®, CFP®, is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional and Director of Operations at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She works with clients and their families to achieve their financial planning goals and also leads the client service, marketing, finance, and human resources departments.

Death of the Stretch IRA

Contributed by: Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®

In December 2019, the SECURE Act was signed into law, it has had a material impact on current and future tax planning since its implementation in 2020. This new legislation carries several critical updates for investors, but the most meaningful change affects an individual’s plan to transfer or receive generational wealth. The elimination of the “Stretch IRA” for most non-spouse beneficiaries will change the most effective planning strategies wealth managers use to help beneficiaries who will be inheriting retirement accounts now and in the future.

The three major changes from the secure act are:

• The Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) age went from 70 ½ to 72.

• Those 70 and older can now make Traditional IRA contributions (must have earned income)

• A large scale Inherited IRA Overhaul, aimed at complicating tax withdrawal strategies from Inherited IRA accounts aka “the death of the Stretch IRA”

The most impactful change from this list is the Inherited IRA Overhaul, the contributing factor that will affect many financial and estate plans is:

• RMD’s for many inherited IRA’s are no longer required, but in most cases, the account must be liquidated within 10 years of the year of death of the primary account holder.

This change will affect all pre-tax retirement accounts, while after-tax accounts such as the Roth IRA distributions will house different tactical distribution strategies.

During the presentation we talk through some creative planning strategies that can be implemented to potentially save current and future taxes under these new legislative measures, such as: using Roth IRA conversions to reduce taxable IRA assets and increase tax-free dollars, Tax-Efficient Charitable Giving through Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs), and beneficiary distribution planning to nullify tax burden.

Finally, we use a pair of case studies to demonstrate how these strategies can reduce tax liability and maximize the achievement of client goals.

To better understand why a retiring couple who are beginning to plan their legacy, or an individual inheriting retirement accounts will need quality tax planning advice - now more than ever, will have their questions answered during this talk.

Applicable timestamps for specific segments are listed below for convenience:  

1:17 – Center for Financial Planning Team Introduction

2:52 – About the Host (Nick Defenthaler)

3:40 – The Secure Act Overview

7:20 – Death of “The Stretch” IRA

11:32 – Today’s Inherited IRA Rules

15:49 – Tax Environment as a Result of TCJA

18:26 – Getting Creative - Roth IRA Conversions

24:40 – Getting Creative – Tax Efficient Charitable Giving

29:12 – Getting Creative – Beneficiary Designations

31:12 – Case Study – Retiree Couple & Legacy Planning

39:38 – Case Study – Beneficiary of an Inherited IRA

49:19 – Creating a Tax Plan

Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected, including diversification and asset allocation. IRA tax deductibility and contribution eligibility may be restricted if your income exceeds certain limits, please consult with a financial professional for more information. Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Tips for Managing Restricted Stock Units

Contributed by: Robert Ingram, CFP®

Does your employer offer company stock as part of your compensation package? There are many forms of equity compensation ranging from different types of stock awards to employee stock options (ESO) and employee stock purchase plans (ESPP). Over the last several years, Restricted Stocks Units (RSU) have become one of the most popular alternatives offered by companies. 

 Unlike pure stock awards that grant shares of stock or stock options that provide an employee the right to purchase shares at a predetermined price for a specific period of time, grants of RSUs are not actual shares of stock (yet). An RSU is essentially a promise made by the employer company to deliver to the employee shares of stock or cash payment for the value of stock shares following a vesting schedule. The vesting schedule is often based on a required length of employment, such as a three-year or four-year period, or other company performance goals. The number of units generally corresponds to shares of stock, but the units have no value until the employee receives the corresponding stock shares (or equivalent payment) when they vest.  

 How do RSUs Work? 

Let’s say your employer company grants you 1,000 Restricted Stock Units this year with a grant date of September 1st, and a 4-year vesting schedule under which 25% of the units vest each year as shares of the company’s stock. The following September 1st after the original grant date (one year later) as long as you had continued your employment, the first 25% of your 1,000 RSUs vests as actual company stock shares. Assuming the market value of the stock at the time of vesting is $50 per share, you would have 250 shares of stock worth $12,500. 

 Once the shares have vested and been delivered, you now have ownership rights such as voting rights and rights to dividend payments. You can also choose to hold or to sell the shares from that point. In each subsequent year going forward, the next 25% of your RSUs would vest until the 4th year when the remaining 250 of the 1,000 units vest. 

 One of the first important planning considerations for Restricted Stock Units is their taxation. How are RSUs taxed and how might that impact your tax situation?

 There are three triggering events with RSUs to understand.

 When You Receive RSU Grants

In most cases, at the time you receive your RSU grants, there are no tax implications. Because there is no transfer of actual property by the company until vesting in the form of shares or cash payment, the IRS does not consider the value of the stock represented by RSUs as income compensation when the grant occurs. This means the RSU grants themselves are not taxed.

 When RSUs Vest 

 Once the restricted units vest and the employer delivers the shares of stock or equivalent cash payment, the fair market value of the vested shares or cash payment as of that date (minus any amount the employee had to pay for the RSUs) is considered income and is taxed as ordinary income. Typically, companies grant RSUs without the employee paying a portion, so the full value of the vested shares would be reported as income.  

 In our example above with the 1,000 RSU grants, 250 RSUs vested with the fair market value of $50 per share for a total value of $12,500. This $12,500 would be considered compensation and would be reportable as ordinary income for that tax year. This would apply to the remaining RSUs in the years that they vest. Because this amount is treated as ordinary income, the applicable tax rate under the federal income tax brackets would apply (as well as applicable state income taxes).  

 To cover the tax withholding for this reported income at vesting, most companies allow you a few options. These may include:

• Having the number of shares withheld to cover the equivalent dollar amount

• Selling shares to provide the proceeds for the withholding amount

• Providing a cash payment into the plan to cover the withholding

When You Sell Shares 

 At the time RSUs vest, the market value of those shares is reported as ordinary income. That per-share value then becomes the new cost basis for that group of shares. If you immediately sell the vested shares as of the vesting date, there would be no additional tax. The value of the shares has already been taxed as ordinary income, and the sale price of the shares would equal the cost basis of the shares (no additional gain or loss).

 If however, you choose to hold the shares and sell them in the future, any difference between the sale price and the cost basis would be a capital gain or capital loss depending on whether the sale price was greater than or less than the cost basis.  

 Once again using our example of the 1,000 RSU grants, let’s assume the fair market value of 250 shares at vesting was $50 per share and that you held those shares for over one year. If you then sold the 250 shares for $75 per share, you would have a capital gain of $25 per share ($75 - $50) for a total of $6,250. Since you held the shares for more than one year from the vesting date, this $6,250 would be taxed as a long-term capital gain and subject to the long-term capital gains tax rate of either 0%, 15%, or 20% (as of 2021) depending on your total taxable income. 

 If you were to sell shares within one year of their vesting date, any capital gain would be a short-term capital gain taxed as ordinary income. Since the federal tax brackets apply to ordinary income, you may pay a higher tax rate on the short-term capital gain than you would on a long-term gain even at the highest long-term capital gains rate of 20% (depending on where your income falls within the tax brackets).

 Planning for Additional Income

Because Restricted Stock Units can add to your taxable income (as the units vest and potentially when you sell shares), there are some strategies you may consider to help offset the extra taxable income in those years. For individuals and couples in higher tax brackets, this can be an especially important planning item.  

Some examples could include:

• Maximizing your pre-tax contributions to your 401k, 403(b), or other retirement accounts. If you or your spouse are not yet contributing to the full annual maximum, this can be a great opportunity. ($19,500 in 2021 plus an extra $6,500 “catch up” for age 50 and above). In some cases, if cash flow is tight, it could even make sense to sell a portion of vested RSUs to replace the income going to the extra contributions.

• Contributions to a Health Savings Account (HSA) are pre-tax/tax-deductible, so each dollar contributed reduces your taxable income. If you have a qualifying high deductible health plan, consider funding an HSA up to the annual maximum ($3,600 for individuals/$,7,200 for family coverage, plus an extra $1,000 “catch up for age 55 and above)

 Deferred Compensation plans (if available) could be an option. Many executive compensation packages offer types of deferred compensation plans. By participating, you generally defer a portion of your income into a plan with the promise that the plan will pay the balance to you in the future. The amount you defer each year does not count towards your income that year. These funds can grow through different investment options, and you select how and when the balance in the plan pays out to you, based on the individual plan rules. While this can be an effective way to reduce current income and build another savings asset, there are many factors to consider before participating. 

• Plans can be complex, often less flexible than other savings vehicles, and dependent on the financial strength and commitment of the employer.

• Harvesting capital losses in a regular, taxable investment account can also be a good tax management strategy. By selling investment holdings that have a loss, those capital losses offset realized capital gains. In addition, if there are any remaining excess losses after offsetting gains, you can then offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income per year. Any excess losses above the $3,000 can be carried over to the following tax year.

 When Should I Sell RSUs?

 The factors in the decision to sell or to hold RSUs that have vested as shares (in addition to tax considerations) should be similar to factors you would consider for other individual stocks or investment securities. A question to ask yourself is whether you would choose to invest your own money in the company stock or some other investment. You should consider the fundamentals of the business. Is it a growing business with good prospects within its industry? Is it in a strong financial position; or is it burdened by excessive debt? Consider the valuation of the company. Is the stock price high or low compared to the company’s earnings and cash flow?

Consider what percentage of your investments and net worth the company stock represents. Having too high a concentration of your wealth in a single security poses the risk of significant loss if the stock price falls. Not only are you taking on overall market risk, but you also have the risk of the single company. While each situation is unique, we generally recommend that your percentage of company stock not exceed 10% of your investment assets.

You should also consider your financial needs both short-term and long-term. 

Do you have cash expenses you need to fund in the next year or two and do you already have resources set aside? 

If you’re counting on proceeds from your RSUs, it could make sense to sell shares and protect the cash needed rather than risk selling shares when the value may be lower.  

 As you can see, equity compensation and specifically RSUs can affect different parts of your financial plan and can involve so many variables. That’s why it’s critical that you work with your financial and tax advisors when making these more complex planning decisions. 

So please don’t hesitate to reach out if we can be a resource.

Robert Ingram, CFP®, is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® With more than 15 years of industry experience, he is a trusted source for local media outlets and frequent contributor to The Center’s “Money Centered” blog.

Disclosure: While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

How To Manage Your Finances After A Divorce

Contributed by: Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CDFA®

Divorce isn’t easy.  Determining a settlement, attending court hearings, and dealing with competing attorneys can weigh heavily on all parties involved. In addition to the emotional impact, divorce is logistically complicated.  Paperwork needs to be filed, processed, submitted, and resubmitted.  Assets need to be split, income needs to be protected, and more paperwork needs to be submitted!  With all of these pieces in motion, it can be difficult to truly understand how your financial position will be impacted.  Now, more than ever, you need to be sure that your finances are on the right track.  Although every circumstance is unique, there are few steps that are helpful in most (if not all) situations.

Assess your current financial situation

Following a divorce, you’ll need to get a handle on your budget. You may be responsible for paying expenses that you were once able to share with your former spouse.  What are your current monthly expenses and income?  Regarding expenses, you’ll want to focus on dividing them into two categories: fixed and discretionary.  Fixed expenses include things like housing, food, transportation, taxes, debt payments, and insurance.  Discretionary expenses include things like entertainment and vacations.

Reevaluate your financial goals

Now that your divorce is finalized, you have the opportunity to reflect on your needs and wants separate from anyone else.  If kids are involved, of course their needs will be considered, but now is a time to reprioritize and focus on your needs, too.  Make a list of things you would like to achieve, and allow yourself to think both short and long-term.  Is saving enough to build a cash cushion important to you?  Is retirement savings a focus?  Are you interested in going back to school?  Is investing your settlement funds in a way that reflects your values important to you?

Review your insurance needs

Typically, insurance coverage for one or both spouses is negotiated as part of a divorce settlement, however, there is often still a need to make future adjustments to coverage.  When it comes to health insurance, having adequate coverage is a priority.  You’ll also want to make sure that your disability or life insurance matches your current needs.  Property insurance should also be updated to reflect any property ownership changes resulting from divorce.

Review your beneficiary designations & estate plan

After a divorce, you’ll want to change the beneficiary designations on any life insurance policies, retirement accounts, and bank or credit union accounts. This is also a good time to update or establish your estate plan.

Consider tax implications

Post-divorce your tax filing status will change.  Filing status is determined as of the last day of the year.  So even if your divorce is finalized on December 31st, for tax purposes, you would be considered divorced for that entire year. Be sure to update your payroll withholding as soon as possible.

You may also have new sources of income, deductions, and tax credits could be affected. 

Stay on top of your settlement action items

Splitting assets is no small task, and it is often time consuming.  The sooner you have accounts in your name only, the sooner you will feel a sense of organization and control.  Diligently following up on QDROs, transfers, and rollovers is important to make sure nothing is missed and the process is moving forward as quickly and efficiently as possible.  Working with a financial professional during this process can help to ensure that accounts are moved, invested, and utilized to best fit your needs.

When your current financial picture is clear, it becomes easier to envision your financial future.  Similarly, having a team of financial professionals on your side can create a feeling of security and support, even as you embrace your new found independence.

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CDFA®, is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.

---

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Opinions expressed in the attached article are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. All opinions are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. Neither Raymond James Financial Services nor any Raymond James Financial Advisor renders advice on tax issues, these matters should be discussed with the appropriate professional.

How The Historically High Cost Of Retirement Income Affects Your Financial Plan

Contributed by: Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®

Now more than ever, we find ourselves reminiscing. And if you’re like me, it’s usually about the simple things in life that were so easy to take for granted. Like going out to eat with a large group of friends, having a surprise birthday party for a loved one, or attending a sporting event or concert with a packed arena filled with 30,000 fans having a great time. COVID has caused this reminiscing to occur and it has also played a role in reminiscing of a world where investors used to receive a reasonable yield on portfolios for a relatively low level of risk.

Interest rates have been on a steady decline for several decades now, so COVID certainly isn’t the only culprit to blame here. That said, reductions in interest rates by the Federal Reserve when the pandemic occurred in spring 2020, certainly did not help. As an advisor who typically works with clients who are within 5 years of retirement or currently retired, it’s common to hear comments like, “When we’re drawing funds from our accounts, we can just live off of the interest which should be at least 4% - 5%!”. Given historical dividend and bond yield averages and the fact that if we go back to the late 90s, an investor could purchase a 10 year US treasury bond yielding roughly 7% (essentially risk-free being that the debt was backed by the US government), I can absolutely see why those who lived through this time frame and likely saw their parents living off this level of interest would make these sort of comments. The sad reality is this – the good old days of living off portfolio interest and yield are pretty much dead right now (unless of course, you have a very low portfolio withdrawal rate) and it will likely remain this way for an extended period.

One way to look at this is that the average, historical “cost” to generate $1,000 of annual income from a 50% stock, 50% bond balanced portfolio has been approximately $25,000 (translates into an average yield of 4%). Today, an investor utilizing the same balanced portfolio must invest $80,000 to achieve the $1,000 annual income goal. This is a 320% increase in the “cost” of creating portfolio income!  

It’s worth noting that this is not an issue unique to the United States. The rising cost of portfolio income is a global conundrum as many countries are currently navigating negative interest rate environments (ex. Switzerland, Denmark and Japan). Click here to learn more about what this actually means and how negative interest rates affect investors. Below is a chart showing the history of the 10-year US government bond and US large cap equities from 1870 to 2020.

Source: Robert Shiller http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/

The chart is a powerful visual and highlights how yields on financial assets have taken a nosedive, especially since the 1980s. The average bond yield over 150 years has been 4.5% and the average dividend yield has been 4.1%. As of December 2020, bond yields were at 0.9% and dividend yields stood at 1.6% - quite the difference from the historical average!

So why this dramatic reduction in yields? It’s a phenomenon likely caused by several factors that we could spend several hours talking about. Some experts suggest that companies have increasingly used stock repurchases to return money to shareholders which coupled with high equity valuations have decreased dividend yields globally. Bond yields have plummeted, in part from a flight to safety following the onset of the pandemic as well as the Federal Reserve’s asset purchasing program and reduction of rates that has been a decade-long trend.

The good news is that a low-interest rate environment has been favorable for stocks as many investors (especially large institutional endowments and hedge funds) are realizing that bonds yields and returns will not satisfy the return requirements for their clients which has led to more capital flowing into the equity markets, therefore, creating a tailwind for equities.

Investors must be cautious when “stretching for yield”, especially retirees in distribution mode. Lower quality, high yield bonds offer the yields they do for a reason – they carry significantly more risk than government and high quality corporate and mortgage-backed bonds. In fact, many “junk bonds” that offer much higher yields, typically have a very similar correlation to stocks which means that these bonds will not offer anywhere near the downside protection that high quality bonds will during bear markets and times of volatility. In 2020, it was not uncommon to see many well-respected high yield bond mutual funds down close to 25% amid the brief bear market we experienced. That said, many of these positions ended the year in positive territory but the ride along the way was a very bumpy one, especially for a bond holding!

The reality is simple – investors who wish to generate historical average yields in their portfolio must take on significantly more risk to do so. It’s also important to note that higher yields do not necessarily translate into higher returns. US large cap value stocks are a perfect example of this. Value stocks, which historically have outperformed growth stocks dating back to the 1920s, have underperformed growth stocks in a meaningful way over the last 5 years. This underperformance is actually part of a longer trend that has extended nearly 20 years. Value companies (think Warren Buffet style of investing) will pay dividends, but if stock price appreciation is muted, the total return for the stock will suffer. Some would argue that the underperformance has been partially caused by investors seeking yield thus causing many dividend-paying value companies to become overbought. In many cases, the risk to reward of “stretching for yield” just isn’t there right now for investors, especially for those in the distribution phase. It simply would not be prudent to meaningfully increase the risk of a client’s allocation for a slight increase in income generated from the portfolio.

As we’ve had to do so much over the past year with COVID, it’s important for investors, especially retirees, to shift their expectations and mindset when it comes to portfolio income. Viewing one’s principal as untouchable and believing yield and income will be sufficient in most cases to support spending in retirement is a mistake, in my opinion. Maximizing total return (price appreciation and income) with an appropriate level of risk will be even more critical in our new normal of low rates that, unfortunately, has no sign of leaving anytime soon.

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

---

Views expressed are not necessarily those of Raymond James and are subject to change without notice. Information provided is general in nature, and is not a complete statement of all information necessary for making an investment decision, and is not a recommendation or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. There is an inverse relationship between interest rate movements and bond prices. Generally, when interest rates rise, bond prices fall and when interest rates fall, bond prices generally rise. Past performance is not indicative of future results. There is no assurance these trends will continue or that forecasts mentioned will occur. Investing always involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss. No investment strategy can guarantee success.

After-Tax 401(k) – An Often Forgotten Strategy

Contributed by: Josh Bitel, CFP®

Roughly half of 401(k) plans today allow participants to make after-tax contributions. These accounts can be a vehicle for both setting aside more assets that have the ability to grow on a tax-deferred basis and as a way to accumulate assets that may be more tax-advantaged when distributed in retirement.

As you discuss after-tax contributions with your financial advisor, you might consider the idea of setting aside a portion of your salary over and above your pre-tax contributions ($19,500 for people under age 50 and $26,000 for those over 50). By making after-tax contributions to your 401(k) plan now, you could build a source of assets for a potentially tax-efficient Roth conversion.

What to consider:

Does your plan allow for after-tax contributions?

Not all plans do. If an after-tax contribution option is available, details of the option should be included in the summary plan description (SPD) for your plan. If you don’t have a copy of your plan’s SPD, ask your human resources department for a copy or find it on your company’s benefits website. You can also talk to your financial advisor about other ways to obtain plan information, such as by requesting a copy of the complete plan document.

What does “after-tax” mean?

After-tax means you instruct your employer to take a portion of your pay — without lowering your taxable wages for federal income tax purposes — and deposit the amount to a separate after-tax account within your 401(k) plan. The money then has the ability to grow tax-deferred. This process differs from your pre-tax option in which your employer takes a portion of your pay and reduces your reported federal taxable wages by the number of your salary deferrals and deposits the funds to your pre-tax deferral account within the plan.

Are there restrictions?

Even if your plan has an after-tax contribution option, there are limits to the amount of your salary that you can set aside on an after-tax basis. Your after-tax contributions combined with your employee salary deferrals and employer contributions for the year 2021, in total, cannot exceed $58,000 (or $64,500 if you are age 50 or over and making catch-up contributions). Your after-tax contributions could be further limited by the plan document and/or meet certain nondiscrimination testing requirements.

Okay, but how does this help me build Roth assets?

When you are eligible to withdraw your 401(k) after-tax account — which could even be while you are still employed — you can rollover or “convert” it to a Roth IRA or a qualified Roth account in your plan, if available. The contributions you made after-tax may be able to be rolled into a Roth IRA each year, even while you are still employed!

If your plan allows for after-tax contributions and you think they may be right for you, it may be time to chat with your financial advisor.

Josh Bitel, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® He conducts financial planning analysis for clients and has a special interest in retirement income analysis.

This material is provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. Any opinions are those of the author and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Q1 2021 Investment Commentary

Contributed by: Center Investment Department

April 2021 - The Center Investment Team provides market feedback for the first quarter.

Rotation. The transformation that turns a figure around a fixed point in mathematics.  So far 2021 has been a story of rotation for markets.  Two of the worst sectors in 2020, energy and financials, have become the best performing sectors so far in 2021.  If you looked at your December 31st statement and made changes based on return only – you would have missed significant gains…an old but good lesson that past performance isn’t necessarily indicative of future returns.

Last year technology benefited the most from the pandemic as people shopped from home, worked from home and looked for entertainment at home.  This year markets have been influenced heavily by the deployment of vaccinations and the hope that we can return to normal soon.

Google trends show increased interest in searches for flights and hotels which is an early sign of pent-up demand for travel that will follow in coming months.

Year to date, through 4/1/2021, a diversified portfolio made up of 40% S&P 500 Index, 20% MSCI EAFE Index and 40% Barclays US Aggregate Bond index is up about 2.4% showing a nice start to the year.  The Federal Reserve has reiterated they are “not even thinking about raising interest rates” according to Chair Jerome Powell.  Despite that, the market has pushed long-term rates higher, pricing in several rate increases before the end of 2023 despite the Fed chair’s messaging.  This has created a challenging return environment to longer dated bonds but results in more attractive interest rates today than we have witnessed in a while.

Economy

Inflation remains muted although we are seeing small pockets due to supply chain disruptions.  Between bottlenecks on the west coast and the blockage of the Suez Canal, it takes goods longer and longer to reach our shores.  A lack of velocity of money continues to be a headwind to higher inflation and the main reason why we haven’t seen it pick up substantially even though the supply of money has grown drastically with monetary and fiscal stimulus. As long as banks don’t have a large incentive to loan money (via higher interest rates) inflation may continue to be muted. 

Initial jobless claims, an early indicator for the direction of unemployment, have dropped to the lowest level recently since the pandemic began.  This should support a continued decline in the unemployment rate.

Government and Stimulus

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was signed in law this past quarter.  This resulted in stimulus checks to the public.  Check out our recent blog for more details. These checks are anticipated to be spent rather than saved.  Check out the graph below showing the spending spike in January after the $600 check was received.  The additional $1,400 checks started getting delivered the week of March 17th.  I expect we will see another spike in consumer spending for March and April.

President Biden hasn’t wasted any time turning attention to the next stimulus plan in the form of the infrastructure bill.  It is likely this bill will not get passed unless mostly “paid for” by other means than deficit financing.  Bargaining on tax hikes has already started in Washington, at least behind the scenes.  It’s going to be a long process, but we can say with high conviction that taxes will likely increase at the corporate and individual levels.  We continue to watch how this will affect markets and you, our clients.  

Impact of Tax Reform on the Stock Market

In wait of details around the Biden administration’s tax reform, which is speculated to increase the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28% and increase GILTI tax rate (foreign tax rate) from 11% to 21%, many are pondering the implications of change on the stock market.  Portfolio strategists believe growth stocks will be most impacted by tax reform.  Some economists estimate that a 28% tax rate could decrease corporate earnings by 9% in 2022.  However, we have to do a bit of perspective-taking before jumping to conclusions about what this means for investors.

1)   Tax reform must go through Congress.  Economists don’t believe a 28% tax rate will pass through congress.  In fact, Goldman Sachs and UBS Financial Services assume a 25% tax rate will pass.  Goldman believes that may look more like a 3% corporate earnings clip, while UBS believes it may be 4%.  Either way, that is much more modest than the 9% some are considering with a 28% tax rate. 

2)   Keep in mind, many forecasters are tempering market expectations already for S&P 500 company profits in 2022.  If the tax hike is less than expected or delayed from the expected timeline there could still be a catalyst for robust market returns in 2022 even with corporate tax rate increases.

3)   Tax reform may not thwart economic growth.  Based on what Biden has proposed in the past, some of the proceeds of tax increases will probably go towards infrastructure spending.  Note: that could help balance the impact of increased tax rates because infrastructure spending usually expands the economy.

4)   Investors are agile.  If growth positions are suspected to be impacted most by tax reform, investors can adjust their strategies to include companies best equipped to handle tax changes.  Not to mention, some companies may even issue special dividends during this time.  When Barack Obama was re-elected in 2012, companies suspected tax hikes (which never came to fruition).  Subsequently, 20 of them issued special dividends. All that to say, there may be some opportunity for investors to pick up investment income.

5)   The last and most important thing to understand when considering the implications of tax reform on the stock market is that historically, there isn’t much correlation between stock market returns and tax reform.  As demonstrated by the chart below, the S&P 500 has been up when taxes both increase and decrease.  Clearly, there is opportunity to meet investment goals no matter the tax policy, so investors should not stray from investment discipline.

Other Headlines: SPACs

More SPACs (Special Purpose Acquisition Company) were created last year than the previous TEN years, and interest in these “blank-check companies” continued to climb in the first quarter of this year. In fact, more money has already been raised in one quarter this year than all of last year’s record year. Here’s a quick look at what they are and why they are taking off. 

First, what is a SPAC? It is a public shell company that raises money to buy a private company. The basic steps look like this:

1. Manager creates a SPAC

2. Investor puts $10 into it

3. Manager buys part of a private company for $10

4. The private company merges with my public SPAC, and boom – you own $10 worth of a company that is now public (OR you think I picked a bad company, and you take your $10 back).

On the surface it seems like a sweet deal; you either get a piece of a hot new company, or you take your $10 back. There are some unique risks to SPACs, though. The big one is obviously that after the merger you are typically left with a small, unproven company. Smaller, private companies are typically quite risky. The company’s stock price might not go up after it becomes public. It might even fall 50, 60, 70%. Ouch! Also, if you don’t like the deal after it is announced, you just missed out on whatever returns you would’ve had elsewhere. Last year, the S&P 500 returned almost 18% (almost 70% from the market bottom on March 23rd)...many investors sat in a SPAC all year only to reject the deal and missed out on huge potential gains.

There’s no definitive reason why SPACs are taking off, but it does show that there are investors willing to take on a high-risk investment. Maybe there is excess cash in the markets, investor exuberance, something to do with low-interest rates, high valuations or low return expectations elsewhere, or confidence in big name SPAC managers; but whatever it is, it has been a lucrative undertaking for those creating the SPACs as the costs paid to the managers/sponsors are not cheap.

Portal Updates

Just a reminder that we have a Center for Financial Planning Inc. app available in the app store for your investment portal!  If you don’t have access to the portal yet, please reach out and we can set this up for you!  Also, we now have the capability to allow you to aggregate your other accounts in this portal for a complete view of you assets in one place!  If you want to learn more, check out our tutorial videos here.

As always, if you have questions please don’t hesitate to reach out to us!  Thank you for the continued trust you place in The Center!

Any opinions are those of the author and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. There is no assurance any of the trends mentioned will continue or forecasts will occur. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 22 developed nations. The Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Diversification and asset allocation do not ensure a profit or protect against a loss. Dividends are not guaranteed and must be authorized by the company's board of directors. Special Purpose Acquisition Companies may not be suitable for all investors. Investors should be familiar with the unique characteristics, risks and return potential of SPACs, including the risk that the acquisition may not occur or that the customer's investment may decline in value even if the acquisition is completed. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Past performance is not a guarantee or a predictor of future results. Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Not All ESG Funds Are Created Equal

Contributed by: Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CDFA®

 

If you’ve read last week’s ESG blog, you should be familiar with the basic ideas driving ESG investing and aware of the recent investor rush to ESG investment funds.  Although 2020 was full of unforeseen circumstances, the trend to Sustainable and Responsible Investing has been building over many years. 

In the past, ESG was often used interchangeably with SRI, or Sustainable and Responsible Investing.  In reality, they are not exactly one in the same.  ESG analysis creates a set of standards used to screen investments through Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria.  Almost all Sustainable and Responsible strategies use at least one of the E, S, or G factors within their analysis, which is perhaps why the ESG abbreviation seems to have taken hold in recent years.  However, there are four prominent Sustainable and Responsible Investment approaches that are most often used to develop a portfolio or mutual fund.

Best-In-Class (Positive) Screening

This strategy involves investing in companies or sectors that have the best, or most positive, ESG performance relative to their peers.  The hope is that the investments selected in a best-in-class process will be able to handle unexpected changes regardless of the industry.  However, one criticism is that this includes all industries and sectors, often incorporating gas, oil, and mining companies, as long as they are handling ESG factors better than their peers.  Some refer to this as the “least bad” approach, as opposed to the best.  This is a good option for those who are afraid to miss out on returns by removing investments due to ESG factors.

Exclusionary Integration

Negative screening is what many so often associate with ESG investing.  This is most likely because it one of the oldest screening approaches and was often guided by religious beliefs with the investments eliminated through this process often referred to as “sin” stocks.  This approach, however, has evolved over the years to be less explicitly aligned with religions.  Now, exclusionary screens work to avoid companies based on more ESG related factors, such as fossil fuels, animal cruelty, and weapons production.  This approach is appropriate for investors who have specific ethical or religious motivations and want to be sure that their money is invested in a way that aligns with their beliefs.

ESG Integration

The ESG Integration approach involves using environmental, social, and governance factors to make decisions within a traditional financial analysis process. This approach does not prohibit investments in any particular sector or industry, and it searches to find value and opportunities by combining ESG information with conventional financial information. This method can include companies who have historically performed poorly in relation to ESG factors but who are working to improve on an environmental, social, or governance issue.  Notice the usage of OR in the last sentence.  This means that companies do not need to score or screen well in all three factors to be included or considered within an ESG integration fund.  This flexibility provides a vast investment universe and can be more palatable for investors who are still skeptical of ESG investing.

Sustainability-Themed Investing

Sustainability-themed investing often develops a portfolio aimed at solving a specific environmental or sustainable issue.  Within the selected theme, such as clean technology, climate change, animal welfare, or green energy, analysts will work to determine the strongest companies who positively represent this issue.  This allows investors to focus their resources on specific trends and to invest in companies who reflect those same beliefs in their business practices.

Although we have discussed these approaches as four separate methodologies, in reality, most ESG mutual funds use a combination of several or all of these tactics to build their portfolio.  This combination, which less frequently excludes specific industries or companies than it has the past, allows for more flexibility, which can translate to more opportunity for investors.  Many believe that companies who are focusing energy and time on ESG factors will be more poised for future success.  Are you interested to know how The Center develops and manages our ESG strategies?  Jaclyn Jackson, CAP® our firm Portfolio Manager will provide some insight next week!

---

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CDFA® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.

Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy selected. Sustainable/Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) considers qualitative environmental, social and corporate governance, also known as ESG criteria, which may be subjective in nature. There are additional risks associated with Sustainable/Socially Responsible Investing (SRI), including limited diversification and the potential for increased volatility. There is no guarantee that SRI products or strategies will produce returns similar to traditional investments. Because SRI criteria exclude certain securities/products for non-financial reasons, utilizing an SRI investment strategy may result in investment returns that may be lower or higher than if decisions were based solely on investment considerations. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision.

ESG Investing: Why Everybody Is Talking About It

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson, CAP®

According to CNBC, almost 1 in 4 dollars is going into Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) funds this year.  Even before 2021, the combination of ethical provisions and competitive performance turned many heads towards ESG investments.  I aim to explain what the big fuss is about and why ESG investments are gaining traction.

Investors Are Talking About It

To be clear, the March 2020 downturn was no picnic (for anyone).  However, investors who had stake in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investments managed the economic downturn with greater resilience.  Leading research firm, Morningstar, reported that during March 2020, “sustainable funds dominated the top quartiles and top halves of their peer groups.  Sixty-six percent of sustainable equity funds ranked in the top halves of their respective categories and more than a third (39%) ranked in their category's best quartile.”  Compared to peers, ESG funds pulled top rankings.

Not only did peer to peer comparisons look good, but index comparisons proved more robust too.  In the same study, Morningstar compared 12 passive ESG funds in the large-blend category to a traditionally passive fund. They reported, “For the year through March 12, all 12 ESG index funds outperformed”. What’s more is that fees were included in this study.  While the ESG passive funds compared were more expensive than the traditional passive fund, they still managed to outperform.  Impressively, the trend held with international and emerging market index comparisons…and everybody is talking about it! 

Including the world’s largest investor/asset manager, BlackRock, who’s CEO challenged corporations to consider the impact of climate change on business models.  In 2020, CEO Larry Fink announced BlackRock would incorporate ESG metrics into 100% of their portfolios.  The asset manager also pledged to produce data and analytics to punctuate why considering climate change should be an investment value. 

Yellen And Powell Are Talking About It

Investors are not the only people concerned.  In wake of recent natural disasters, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell are working to assess the risks climate change poses to the health and resilience of the financial system.  Their consensus implied a concentrated effort to monitor financial institutions and their exposure to extreme weather events.  Leading the charge, Fed Governor Lael Brainard, recently announced the Financial Supervision Climate Committee (FSCC).  Brainard is a proponent of using scenario testing to understand banks’ ability to survive hypothetical climate catastrophes.  The FSCC will focus on developing evaluation processes for climate risks to the financial system.

Why Everybody Is Talking About It

While many people acknowledge the ethical appeal of ESG methodologies, they may not fully appreciate the businesses appeal that underpins stock performance.  Business litigation risk provides a clear example.  The Financial Analyst Journal featured a study that explored the relationship between ESG performance and company litigation risks.  Analyzing US class action lawsuits, researchers found, “a 1 standard deviation improvement in the ESG controversies of an average company in the sample reduced litigation risk from 3.1% to 2.4%”.  The study also asserted that companies with low ESG performance experienced market value losses ($1.14 billion) twice the size of companies with high ESG performance.  Further, the study integrated their findings with a trading strategy and concluded investors benefitted from lower litigation risk.

It doesn’t stop with litigation risk.  There are also links between healthy corporate governance and market returns.  As You Sow, a nonprofit promoting corporate responsibility, has been tracking S&P 500 companies with excessively compensated CEOs since 2015.  They collaborated with R. Paul Herman, CEO of HIP Investor Inc., to do performance analysis based on their tracking. Herman determined, “…shareholders could have avoided lagging returns by excluding companies that keep making the list for excessive CEO pay”.  Companies without excessively paid CEOs significantly outperformed companies with excessively paid CEOs.  The former generated 5.6% in annualized returns compared to the latter at 1.5%.  What’s astonishing is that the report noted, “The performance gap due to excessive compensation equates to approximately $223 billion in shareholder value lost.”  How are companies without overpaid CEOs edging out competitors?  Instead of overpaying CEOs, more resources can be dedicated to research and development projects, dividends to shareholders, or equitable pay for employees; things that advantage company profits and support positive investor outcomes.

Are You Talking About It?

There is definitely a case for the merits of ESG investing.  It is no wonder folks are talking about it.  Are you interested in the conversation?  If you’ve followed trends in ESG investing and are considering adapting ESG strategies into your portfolio, The Center is here to help.  Ask your advisor about the Center Social Strategy; they would be happy to talk about it with you.

---

Jaclyn Jackson, CAP® is a Portfolio Manager at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She manages client portfolios and performs investment research.

This material is provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. Any opinions are those of the author and not necessarily those of Raymond James. There is no guarantee that the statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Utilizing an ESG investment strategy may result in investment returns that may be lower or higher than if decisions were based solely on investment considerations. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Am I Spending Enough Or Saving Too Much?

Contributed by: Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CDFA®

No you didn’t read that title incorrectly.  After decades of consistent and focused saving, how do you change your mentality to feel comfortable spending what you’ve worked so hard to accumulate?  Good savers spend decades developing the discipline to save, plan, and minimize debt, all for the ultimate goal of reaching financial independence and freedom.  However, when it comes time to use those hard-earned funds to support your retirement lifestyle, it can be a difficult transition.

The Center defines financial planning as a coordinated and comprehensive approach to reaching your financial goals.  It necessitates an appropriate balance between spending now and investing for the future.  That is a difficult balance to maintain, and without truly understanding your current resources and future needs, it is easy to miss the mark.  Without professional analysis and review, many either spend too much now and jeopardize future goals or have save too aggressively and end up unnecessarily sacrificing current quality of life. 

In planning, we can quantify what it takes to meet future financial goals, and make sure that we are doing what is needed to help reach those objectives.  In some cases, that knowledge can provide the freedom to actually reduce savings.  Beyond just allowing increased spending, this can also provide the opportunity to pursue passions as opposed to income.

When finally reaching that retirement finish line, however, turning your savings into income can be a daunting task.  Pulling from a balance that you’ve worked years to accumulate and build up can be uncomfortable, especially if you don’t know how much you can safely withdrawal without jeopardizing your long term financial security.  If you’re like many of our clients, it isn’t uncommon to react to this discomfort by under-spending and unintentionally accumulating money throughout retirement. 

Life is all about balance.  In this example, it’s about protecting your financial future while also enjoying life now.  If you’re in the enviable position of having more than you need for retirement, making a meaningful plan for the excess can help to ease the reluctance to spend.  Whether it is gifting, creating a financial legacy, or granting yourself permission to indulge a bit, if it brings you joy, it is worth considering.  Of course we would not recommend spending money frivolously, but, the ultimate goal is to pursue areas of interest because they are meaningful and important to you - unconstrained by financial concerns.  Isn’t that true financial freedom?  

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CDFA®, is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.

---

Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss.